Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155246›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Dissociation between frontal and temporal-parietal contributions to connected speech in acute stroke.

Junhua Ding, Randi C Martin, A Cris Hamilton, Tatiana T Schnur

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute-Phase Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Aphasia and Discourse Recovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junhua DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Randi C MartinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
A Cris HamiltonDepartment of Institution Reporting, Research and Information Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Tatiana T SchnurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USRice University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Language and neural recovery from stroke: Role of selection and working memoryR01DC014976 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SCHNUR, TATIANA TAMARA · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are uniquely able to retrieve and combine words into syntactic structure to produce connected speech. Previous identification of focal brain regions necessary for production focused primarily on associations with the content produced by speakers with chronic stroke, where function may have shifted to other regions after reorganization occurred. Here, we relate patterns of brain damage with deficits to the content and structure of spontaneous connected speech in 52 speakers during the acute stage of a left hemisphere stroke. Multivariate lesion behaviour mapping demonstrated that damage to temporal-parietal regions impacted the ability to retrieve words and produce them within increasingly complex combinations. Damage primarily to inferior frontal cortex affected the production of syntactically accurate structure. In contrast to previous work, functional-anatomical dissociations did not depend on lesion size likely because acute lesions were smaller than typically found in chronic stroke. These results are consistent with predictions from theoretical models based primarily on evidence from language comprehension and highlight the importance of investigating individual differences in brain-language relationships in speakers with acute stroke.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingParietal LobeSpeech DisordersStrokeTemporal Lobeacute strokeconnected speechlanguagelesion behaviour mappingsyntax

Identifiers

PMID32155246
PMCPMC7089660
OpenAlexW3012561238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.