Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155226›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Influence of the new standardized clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol on immunogenicity of arterial allografts in rats.

Jan Hruby, Rudolf Spunda, Pavel Mericka, Mikulas Mlcek, Ondrej Pecha, Katrin Splith, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Krenzien, Jaroslav Lindner, Miroslav Spacek and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Progress in the application of patch materials in cardiovascular surgery.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jan Hruby2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Rudolf Spunda2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel MerickaTissue Bank, Faculty Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University- Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Mikulas MlcekInstitute of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague.
Ondrej PechaTechnology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Katrin SplithDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Moritz SchmelzleDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix KrenzienDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jaroslav Lindner2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8432-4069
Miroslav Spacek2nd Department of Surgery-Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivan MatiaDepartment of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Nord Hospital and Karl Landsteiner Institute for Cardio-Vascular Research, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1581-2496
Charles University · CZCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECzech Academy of Sciences · CZKarl Landsteiner Society · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND

designAt the present time there are two waiting list for patients with vascular prosthetic infection indicated for arterial transplantation in the Czech Republic. The inclusion of each patient for cold-stored or cryopreserved arterial transplantation is the preference of indicating surgeon. In this experimental work we studied the immunogenicity of rat aortal allografts treated by our new clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol. MATERIAL AND

methodsBrown-Norway (BN) (N = 6, 203-217 g) or Lewis (LEW) (N = 6, 248-254 g) abdominal aortal grafts treated in accordance with our new clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol were orthotopically transplanted to Lewis recipients (N = 12, 191-245 g). Aortal wall histology and infiltration by recipient immune cells, as well as donor specific anti MHC class I and II antibodies in recipient serum were studied in both isografts and allografts on day 30 postransplant. Core data of cryopreserved allografts were compared to our previous data of cold-stored aortal allografts treated in accordance with our clinical cold-storage protocol.

resultsCryopreserved allografts showed regular morphology of aortal wall with clear differentiation of all three basic anatomical layers on day 30 postransplant. Intimal layer showed no hyperplasia, luminal surface was covered by endothelial cells. No statistical difference was observed in tunica media thickness between isografts and allografts. The medial layer showed no necrosis, shrinkage or immunoglobuline G deposition in any experimental group. The adventitial infiltration by immune cells was significantly higher (P<0.05) in allografts. Cryopreserved allografts showed significant lower activation of both cell- and antibody mediated immunity compared to historical data of cold-stored allografts.

conclusionAortal wall histology of rat allografts treated by our new standardized clinical cryopreservation/slow thawing protocol was comparable to that of the cryopreserved isografts on day 30 posttranspant. The immunogenicity of cryopreserved aortal allografts was significantly lower compared to that of cold-stored aortal allografts.

Indexed as

AllograftsAnimalsAortaArteriesCryopreservationCzech RepublicGraft RejectionMaleModels, AnimalRatsRats, Inbred BNRats, Inbred LewTransplantation, Homologous

Identifiers

PMID32155226
PMCPMC7064217
OpenAlexW3011033848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.