Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155203›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Prediction of Poor Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Osteosarcoma: Additive Value of Diffusion-Weighted MRI including Volumetric Analysis to Standard MRI at 3T.

Seul Ki Lee, Won-Hee Jee, Chan Kwon Jung, Soo Ah Im, Nack-Gyun Chung, Yang-Guk Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seul Ki LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6296-5559
Won-Hee JeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1875-3997
Chan Kwon JungDepartment of Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Ah ImDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nack-Gyun ChungDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yang-Guk ChungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the added value of diffusion weighted image (DWI) including volumetric analysis to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting poor responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma at 3-Tesla.

methods3-Tesla Standard MRI and DWI in 17 patients were reviewed by two independent readers. Standard MRI was reviewed using a five-level-confidence score. Two-dimensional (2D) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)mean and 2D ADCminimum were measured from a single-section region of interest. An ADC histogram derived from whole-tumor volume was generated including 3D ADCmean, 3D ADCskewness, and 3D ADCkurtosis. The Mann-Whitney-U test, receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC) analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

resultsThere were 13 poor responders and 4 good responders. Statistical differences were found in posttreatment and percent change of both 2D ADCmean and 2D ADCminimum, posttreatment 3D ADCmean, and posttreatment 3D ADCskewness between two groups. The best predictors of poor responders were posttreatment 2D ADCmean and posttreatment 3D ADCskewness. Sensitivity and specificity of the 1st model (standard MRI alone), 2nd model (standard MRI+posttreatment 2D ADCmean), and 3rd model (standard MRI+posttreatment 2D ADCmean+posttreatment 3D ADCskewness) were 85% and 25%, 85% and 75%, and 85% and 100% for reader 1 and 77% and 25%, 77% and 50%, and 85% and 100% for reader 2, respectively. The AUC of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd models were 0.548, 0.798, and 0.923 for reader 1 and 0.510, 0.635, and 0.923 for reader 2, respectively.

conclusionThe addition of DWI including volumetric analysis to standard MRI improves the diagnostic accuracy for predicting poor responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma at 3-Tesla.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteosarcomaPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32155203
PMCPMC7064235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.