Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155189›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Fractal solar panels: Optimizing aesthetic and electrical performances.

Ellis T Roe, Alexander J Bies, Rick D Montgomery, William J Watterson, Blake Parris, Cooper R Boydston, Margaret E Sereno, Richard P Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellis T RoeDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Alexander J BiesDepartment of Psychology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2126-9175
Rick D MontgomeryDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
William J WattersonDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Blake ParrisDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Cooper R BoydstonDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Margaret E SerenoDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
Richard P TaylorDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America.
University of Oregon · USGonzaga University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar energy technologies have been plagued by their limited visual appeal. Because the electrical power generated by solar panels increases with their surface area and therefore their occupancy of the observer's visual field, aesthetics will play an increasingly critical role in their future success in urban environments. Inspired by previous psychology research highlighting the aesthetic qualities of fractal patterns, we investigated panel designs featuring fractal electrodes. We conducted behavioral studies which compared observers' preferences for fractal and conventional bus-bar electrode patterns, along with computer simulations which compared their electrical performances. This led us to develop a hybrid electrode pattern which best combines the fractal and bus-bar designs. Here we show that the new hybrid electrode matches the electrical performance of bus-bars in terms of light transmission and minimizing electrical power losses, while benefiting from the superior aesthetics of fractal patterns. This innovative integration of psychology and engineering studies provides a framework for developing novel electrode patterns with increased implementation and acceptance.

Indexed as

Electric Power SuppliesElectrodesEquipment DesignFractalsSolar EnergyAdolescentAdultAgedEstheticsEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMiddle AgedSunlightSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32155189
PMCPMC7064250
OpenAlexW3011252542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.