Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155146›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Low mutational load and high mutation rate variation in gut commensal bacteria.

Ricardo S Ramiro, Paulo Durão, Claudia Bank, Isabel Gordo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antimicrobial Resistance and Phylo-Groups ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Emergence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome and transcriptomic analysis of the adaptation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Intrahost evolution of the gut microbiota.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Shared Evolutionary Path in Social Microbiomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo S RamiroInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4834-6997
Paulo DurãoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4411-2958
Claudia BankInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-758X
Isabel GordoInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-5143
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria generally live in species-rich communities, such as the gut microbiota. Yet little is known about bacterial evolution in natural ecosystems. Here, we followed the long-term evolution of commensal Escherichia coli in the mouse gut. We observe the emergence of mutation rate polymorphism, ranging from wild-type levels to 1,000-fold higher. By combining experiments, whole-genome sequencing, and in silico simulations, we identify the molecular causes and explore the evolutionary conditions allowing these hypermutators to emerge and coexist within the microbiota. The hypermutator phenotype is caused by mutations in DNA polymerase III proofreading and catalytic subunits, which increase mutation rate by approximately 1,000-fold and stabilise hypermutator fitness, respectively. Strong mutation rate variation persists for >1,000 generations, with coexistence between lineages carrying 4 to >600 mutations. The in vivo molecular evolution pattern is consistent with fitness effects of deleterious mutations sd ≤ 10-4/generation, assuming a constant effect or exponentially distributed effects with a constant mean. Such effects are lower than typical in vitro estimates, leading to a low mutational load, an inference that is observed in in vivo and in vitro competitions. Despite large numbers of deleterious mutations, we identify multiple beneficial mutations that do not reach fixation over long periods of time. This indicates that the dynamics of beneficial mutations are not shaped by constant positive Darwinian selection but could be explained by other evolutionary mechanisms that maintain genetic diversity. Thus, microbial evolution in the gut is likely characterised by partial sweeps of beneficial mutations combined with hitchhiking of slightly deleterious mutations, which take a long time to be purged because they impose a low mutational load. The combination of these two processes could allow for the long-term maintenance of intraspecies genetic diversity, including mutation rate polymorphism. These results are consistent with the pattern of genetic polymorphism that is emerging from metagenomics studies of the human gut microbiota, suggesting that we have identified key evolutionary processes shaping the genetic composition of this community.

Indexed as

Mutation RateAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA Polymerase IIIEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroorganisms, Genetically-ModifiedSelection, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA Polymerase IIIDNA polymerase III, alpha subunitdnaQ protein, E coliEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32155146
PMCPMC7064181
OpenAlexW3012225565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.