ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Estimation of neural network model parameters from local field potentials (LFPs).
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased Perceptual Reliability Reduces Membrane Potential Variability in Cortical Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- On the validity of electric brain signal predictions based on population firing rates.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Multitask learning of a biophysically-detailed neuron model.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Discovering optimal features for neuron-type identification from extracellular recordings.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Metamodelling of a two-population spiking neural network.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Virtual Intelligence: A Systematic Review of the Development of Neural Networks in Brain Simulation Units.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- From mechanisms to markers: novel noninvasive EEG proxy markers of the neural excitation and inhibition system in humans.Translational psychiatry · 2022Review
- Brain signal predictions from multi-scale networks using a linearized framework.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Active Dendrites and Local Field Potentials: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Explorations.Neuroscience · 2022Review
- Mean-field based framework for forward modeling of LFP and MEG signals.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Computational Models in Electroencephalography.Brain topography · 2022Review
- Computation of the electroencephalogram (EEG) from network models of point neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most modeling in systems neuroscience has been descriptive where neural representations such as 'receptive fields', have been found by statistically correlating neural activity to sensory input. In the traditional physics approach to modelling, hypotheses are represented by mechanistic models based on the underlying building blocks of the system, and candidate models are validated by comparing with experiments. Until now validation of mechanistic cortical network models has been based on comparison with neuronal spikes, found from the high-frequency part of extracellular electrical potentials. In this computational study we investigated to what extent the low-frequency part of the signal, the local field potential (LFP), can be used to validate and infer properties of mechanistic cortical network models. In particular, we asked the question whether the LFP can be used to accurately estimate synaptic connection weights in the underlying network. We considered the thoroughly analysed Brunel network comprising an excitatory and an inhibitory population of recurrently connected integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons. This model exhibits a high diversity of spiking network dynamics depending on the values of only three network parameters. The LFP generated by the network was computed using a hybrid scheme where spikes computed from the point-neuron network were replayed on biophysically detailed multicompartmental neurons. We assessed how accurately the three model parameters could be estimated from power spectra of stationary 'background' LFP signals by application of convolutional neural nets (CNNs). All network parameters could be very accurately estimated, suggesting that LFPs indeed can be used for network model validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.