Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32155141›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Estimation of neural network model parameters from local field potentials (LFPs).

Jan-Eirik W Skaar, Alexander J Stasik, Espen Hagen, Torbjørn V Ness, Gaute T Einevoll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Increased Perceptual Reliability Reduces Membrane Potential Variability in Cortical Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Computing Extracellular Electric Potentials from Neuronal Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan-Eirik W SkaarFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-5926
Alexander J StasikDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen HagenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-5970
Torbjørn V NessFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-8502
Gaute T EinevollFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5425-5012
University of Oslo · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most modeling in systems neuroscience has been descriptive where neural representations such as 'receptive fields', have been found by statistically correlating neural activity to sensory input. In the traditional physics approach to modelling, hypotheses are represented by mechanistic models based on the underlying building blocks of the system, and candidate models are validated by comparing with experiments. Until now validation of mechanistic cortical network models has been based on comparison with neuronal spikes, found from the high-frequency part of extracellular electrical potentials. In this computational study we investigated to what extent the low-frequency part of the signal, the local field potential (LFP), can be used to validate and infer properties of mechanistic cortical network models. In particular, we asked the question whether the LFP can be used to accurately estimate synaptic connection weights in the underlying network. We considered the thoroughly analysed Brunel network comprising an excitatory and an inhibitory population of recurrently connected integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons. This model exhibits a high diversity of spiking network dynamics depending on the values of only three network parameters. The LFP generated by the network was computed using a hybrid scheme where spikes computed from the point-neuron network were replayed on biophysically detailed multicompartmental neurons. We assessed how accurately the three model parameters could be estimated from power spectra of stationary 'background' LFP signals by application of convolutional neural nets (CNNs). All network parameters could be very accurately estimated, suggesting that LFPs indeed can be used for network model validation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsComputational BiologyNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeurons

Identifiers

PMID32155141
PMCPMC7083334
OpenAlexW3011326612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.