ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020
Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Compression on Deep Learning in Digital Pathology Image Analysis.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computer vision applications for the detection or analysis of tuberculosis using digitised human lung tissue images - a systematic review.BMC medical imaging · 2024Pooled it
- From Mechanical Instability to Virtual Precision: Digital Twin Validation for Next-Generation MEMS-Based Eye-Tracking Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Lossy DICOM conversion may affect AI performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of digital pathology: Novel baselines for compression.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Quantitative digital pathology enables automated and quantitative assessment of inflammatory activity in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Digital pathology, deep learning, and cancer: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- Tissue Contamination Challenges the Credibility of Machine Learning Models in Real World Digital Pathology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2024Article
- Algorithm-assisted diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease - evaluation of robustness and comparative image analysis on data from various labs and slide scanners.Diagnostic pathology · 2024Article
- CohortFinder: an open-source tool for data-driven partitioning of digital pathology and imaging cohorts to yield robust machine-learning models.Npj imaging · 2024Article
- Pathological changes or technical artefacts? The problem of the heterogenous databases in COVID-19 CXR image analysis.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Multi-site cross-organ calibrated deep learning (MuSClD): Automated diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer.Medical image analysis · 2023Article
- How to learn with intentional mistakes: NoisyEnsembles to overcome poor tissue quality for deep learning in computational pathology.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Quality control stress test for deep learning-based diagnostic model in digital pathology.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDeep learning (DL), a class of approaches involving self-learned discriminative features, is increasingly being applied to digital pathology (DP) images for tasks such as disease identification and segmentation of tissue primitives (eg, nuclei, glands, lymphocytes). One application of DP is in telepathology, which involves digitally transmitting DP slides over the Internet for secondary diagnosis by an expert at a remote location. Unfortunately, the places benefiting most from telepathology often have poor Internet quality, resulting in prohibitive transmission times of DP images. Image compression may help, but the degree to which image compression affects performance of DL algorithms has been largely unexplored.
methodsWe investigated the effects of image compression on the performance of DL strategies in the context of 3 representative use cases involving segmentation of nuclei (n = 137), segmentation of lymph node metastasis (n = 380), and lymphocyte detection (n = 100). For each use case, test images at various levels of compression (JPEG compression quality score ranging from 1-100 and JPEG2000 compression peak signal-to-noise ratio ranging from 18-100 dB) were evaluated by a DL classifier. Performance metrics including F1 score and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were computed at the various compression levels.
resultsOur results suggest that DP images can be compressed by 85% while still maintaining the performance of the DL algorithms at 95% of what is achievable without any compression. Interestingly, the maximum compression level sustainable by DL algorithms is similar to where pathologists also reported difficulties in providing accurate interpretations.
conclusionOur findings seem to suggest that in low-resource settings, DP images can be significantly compressed before transmission for DL-based telepathology applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.