ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2020
Evaluation of metal artefacts for two CBCT devices with a new dental arch phantom.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Phantom Containing Implants Angulation on the Amount of Metal Artifacts Around the Implants in CBCT Images.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- What Drives Metal Artifacts in CBCT? A Comparative Study of Detector Types and Metallic Object Configurations.Radiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Impact of Combined Deep Learning Image Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm on CT Image Quality in Different Scanning Conditions for Maxillofacial Region with Metal Implants: A Phantom Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Position and variation in the number of high-density objects influence the expression of volumetric alteration artifacts in cone-beam computed tomographic images.Imaging science in dentistry · 2025Article
- Expression of beam hardening artifacts on horizontally stitched cone-beam computed tomography images.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Is a Pre-Existent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Able to Detect Metal Dental Posts?Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Effect of metal artefact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Does cone-beam CT convex triangular field of view influence the image shape distortion of high-density materials?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2023Article
- The impact of teeth and dental restorations on gray value distribution in cone-beam computer tomography: a pilot study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023Article
- Article
- A novel method of objectively detecting tooth ankylosis using cone-beam computed tomography: A laboratory study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- The Effect of Changes in the Angular Position of Implants on Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images: A Scoping Review.Radiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Does the size of an object containing dental implant affect the expression of artifacts in cone beam computed tomography imaging?Head & face medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of the expression of the volumetric alteration artifact in cylindrical and triangular fields of view in two cone-beam computed tomography devices.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Effect of the Field of View Size on CBCT Artifacts Caused by the Presence of Metal Objects in the Exomass.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- Distortion or magnification? AnDento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Cone-beam computed tomography artifacts in the presence of dental implants and associated factors: an integrative review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2021Article
- Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo create a new phantom design to evaluate the real impact of artefacts caused by titanium on bone structures in cone beam CT images considering different positions and quantity of metals in the dental arch, with and without metal artefact reduction (MAR).
methodsA three cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) plate phantom was designed containing eight perforations arranged to simulate the lower dental arch in the intermediate plate. Three titanium cylinders were positioned in different locations and quantities to test different clinical conditions and to quantify the impact of the metal artefact around five bone cylinders. Scans were carried out in seven different protocols (Control, A-F) in two cone beam CT devices (OP300 Maxio and Picasso Trio). Eight regions of interest around each cortical and trabecular bone were used to measure the grey value standard deviation corresponding the artefact expression in the Image J software. Both the artefact expression and the MAR effect were assessed using the Wilcoxon, Friedman (Dunn) and Kruskal-Wallis tests (significance level of 5%).
resultsFor both devices, MAR was statistically efficient only for the protocols E, and F. Protocol F (three metals on the adjacent area of the analysis region) showed higher artefact expression when compared to the others.
conclusionIn conclusion, the new phantom design allowed the quantification of the metal artefact expression caused by titanium. The metal artefact expression is higher when more metal objects are positioned in the adjacent bone structures. MAR may not be effective to reduce artefact expression on the adjacencies of those objects for the devices studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.