Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154945›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2020

Bone Adaptation in Adult Women Is Related to Loading Dose: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.

Karen L Troy, Megan E Mancuso, Joshua E Johnson, Zheyang Wu, Thomas J Schnitzer, Tiffiny A Butler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04135196 (A Prospective Study of Human Bone Adaptation Using a Novel in Vivo Loading Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04135196 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective Study of Human Bone Adaptation Using a Novel in Vivo Loading Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorWorcester Polytechnic InstituteRan2014 to 2019Enrolled102ConditionsBone LossArmsvoluntary forearm loading task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Trajectories of areal bone mineral density significantly differ by patterning of femoral neck area and bone mineral content across the menopausal transition.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  5. The association between physical activity during growth and bone microarchitecture at peak bone mass.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Biomechanics of a Drop Landing: Osteogenic Stimulus Measures May Vary.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effect of External Mechanical Stimuli on Human Bone: a narrative review.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted rowing combined with zoledronic acid, but not alone, preserves distal femur strength and stiffness in people with chronic spinal cord injury.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen L TroyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-0066
Megan E MancusoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-2521
Joshua E JohnsonOrthopaedic Biomechanics Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8049-4105
Zheyang WuDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Thomas J SchnitzerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-5431
Tiffiny A ButlerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

A prospective study of human bone adaptation using a novel in-vivo loading modelR01AR063691 · NIAMS · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI TROY, KAREN L · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063691NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR063691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although strong evidence exists that certain activities can increase bone density and structure in people, it is unclear what specific mechanical factors govern the response. This is important because understanding the effect of mechanical signals on bone could contribute to more effective osteoporosis prevention methods and efficient clinical trial design. The degree to which strain rate and magnitude govern bone adaptation in humans has never been prospectively tested. Here, we studied the effects of a voluntary upper extremity compressive loading task in healthy adult women during a 12-month prospective period. A total of 102 women age 21 to 40 years participated in one of two experiments: (i) low (n = 21) and high (n = 24) strain magnitude; or (ii) low (n = 21) and high (n = 20) strain rate. Control (n = 16) no intervention. Strains were assigned using subject-specific finite element models. Load cycles were recorded digitally. The primary outcome was change in ultradistal radius integral bone mineral content (iBMC), assessed with QCT. Interim time points and secondary outcomes were assessed with high resolution pQCT (HRpQCT) at the distal radius. Sixty-six participants completed the intervention, and interim data were analyzed for 77 participants. Likely related to improved compliance and higher received loading dose, both the low-strain rate and high-strain rate groups had significant 12-month increases to ultradistal iBMC (change in control: -1.3 ± 2.7%, low strain rate: 2.7 ± 2.1%, high strain rate: 3.4 ± 2.2%), total iBMC, and other measures. "Loading dose" was positively related to 12-month change in ultradistal iBMC, and interim changes to total BMD, cortical thickness, and inner trabecular BMD. Participants who gained the most bone completed, on average, 128 loading bouts of (mean strain) 575 με at 1878 με/s. We conclude that signals related to strain magnitude, rate, and number of loading bouts contribute to bone adaptation in healthy adult women, but only explain a small amount of variance in bone changes. © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Indexed as

Bone DensityCarpal BonesAdultBone and BonesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesRadiusWeight-BearingYoung AdultBIOMECHANICSBONE MODELING AND REMODELINGBONE QCT/μCTCLINICAL TRIALSEXERCISE

Identifiers

PMID32154945
PMCPMC7363573
OpenAlexW3011237879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.