Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154886›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Association of Disease Progression With Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Breast, Lung, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Cancer.

Norbert Marschner, Stefan Zacharias, Florian Lordick, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, Uwe Martens, Anja Welt, Volker Hagen, Wolfgang Gleiber, Sabine Bohnet, Lisa Kruggel and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07454486 (TRACE-BTC. Relation of Biomarkers and Patients Reported Quality of Life to Outcomes in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07454486 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

TRACE-BTC. Relation of Biomarkers and Patients Reported Quality of Life to Outcomes in Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer: a Real- World Cohort

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAarhus University HospitalRan2026 to 2031Enrolled300ConditionsBiliary Tract Cancer (BTC), Biliary Tract Cancer (CCA), Gall Bladder Cancer, Biliary Tract Cancers (BTC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The value of FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: balancing efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Health-related quality of life trajectories in older adult long-term survivors of colorectal cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Norbert MarschnerPraxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany.
Stefan ZachariasKompetenzzentrum für klinische Studien Bremen, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Florian LordickUniversity Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Susanna Hegewisch-BeckerOnkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Hamburg, Germany.
Uwe MartensKlinik für Innere Medizin III, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Germany.
Anja WeltInnere Klinik Tumorforschung, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Volker HagenKlinik für Innere Medizin II, OnkoZentrum, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany.
Wolfgang GleiberUniversitätsklinikum Frankfurt Medizinische Klinik I, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie/Allergologie, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sabine BohnetMed. Klinik III, Pneumologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Lisa KruggelClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Stephanie DilleMedical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Arnd NuschPraxis für Hämatologie und internistische Onkologie, Ratingen, Germany.
Steffen DörfelOnkozentrum Dresden/Freiberg, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas DeckerStudienzentrum Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany.
Martina JänickeClinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Iomedico (Germany) · DEPraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEEssen University Hospital · DELeipzig University · DEOnkozentrum Dresden · DERavensburg University of Cooperative Education · DESLK-Kliniken Heilbronn · DESt.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Mortality, morbidity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are patient-relevant end points generally considered in the early benefit assessments of new cancer treatments. Progression-related end points, such as time to progression or progression-free survival, are not included, although patients and physicians testify to the detrimental association of disease progression with HRQoL. Objective: To examine the association of disease progression and HRQoL in 4 prevalent solid-cancer entities in routine clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated data from 4 prospective, nonintervention, multicenter registries collected between 2011 and 2018 in 203 centers in Germany. Patients' HRQoL was assessed regularly for up to 5 years. The change in HRQoL scores after disease progression was examined with linear mixed models, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Patients with metastatic breast, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer were recruited at the start of systemic first-line treatment. Data analysis was performed from February 2019 to April 2019. Exposures: All patients received systemic, palliative first-line treatment according to their physician's choice. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was deterioration of HRQoL associated with disease progression, as measured by 4 validated questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version 4, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 version 3.0, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL version 1, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: More than 8000 questionnaires from 2314 patients with 2562 documented disease progressions were analyzed. In total, 464 patients had breast cancer (464 [100.0%] female; median [range] age, 61.6 [26.4-90.1] years), 807 patients had pancreatic cancer (352 [43.6%] female; median [range] age, 70.0 [39.0-93.0] years), 341 patients had lung cancer (118 [34.6%] female; median [range] age, 65.9 [28.4-88.2] years), and 702 patients had colorectal cancer (248 [35.3%] female; median [range] age, 66.9 [26.9-92.1] years). The first disease progression was associated with a statistically significant worsening of 37 of 45 HRQoL scales; for 17 of these scales, the worsening was clinically meaningful. Scale scores for appetite loss (pancreatic cancer, 10.2 points [95% CI, 6.8-13.5 points]; lung cancer, 10.8 points [95% CI, 5.4-16.2 points]; colorectal cancer, 8.8 points [95% CI, 5.5-12.2]; all P < .001), physical functioning (pancreatic cancer, 6.2 points [95% CI, 3.8-8.5 points]; lung cancer, 8.4 points [95% CI, 5.4-11.5 points]; colorectal cancer, 5.0 points [95% CI, 3.0-7.0 points]; all P < .001), and fatigue (pancreatic cancer, 5.5 points [95% CI, 3.0-7.9 points]; lung cancer, 7.7 points [95% CI, 4.3-11.1]; colorectal cancer, 4.5 points [95% CI, 2.1-6.9 points]; all P < .001) were most affected, irrespective of the type of cancer. The association with global HRQoL was most pronounced in lung cancer (6.7 points [95% CI, 3.5-9.9 points]; P < .001) and pancreatic cancer (5.4 points [95% CI, 3.3-7.5 points]; P < .001) and less in colorectal cancer (3.5 points [95% CI, 1.3-5.7 points]; P = .002) and breast cancer (2.4 points [95% CI, 1.0-3.9 points]; P = .001). The second progression was associated with an even larger decrease in HRQoL. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that disease progression is associated with a deterioration in HRQoL among patients with metastatic breast, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer. This evidence highlights the importance of progression-related end points, such as time to progression and progression-free survival, as additional patient-relevant end points when evaluating the benefit of new treatments for patients with metastatic cancer.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionQuality of LifeAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHealth StatusHumansLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32154886
PMCPMC7064873
OpenAlexW3010719773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.