Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154865›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2021

Risk prediction models for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in England.

Chen Ji, Terry P Brown, Scott J Booth, Claire Hawkes, Jerry P Nolan, James Mapstone, Rachael T Fothergill, Robert Spaight, Sarah Black, Gavin D Perkins and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Chen JiWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Terry P BrownWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Scott J BoothWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Claire HawkesWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Jerry P NolanWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
James MapstoneSouth of England, Public Health England, UK.
Rachael T FothergillWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Robert SpaightEast Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Nottingham NG8 6PY, UK.
Sarah BlackSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter EX2 7HY, UK.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
OHCAO Collaborators
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBEast Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBRoyal United Hospital · GBSouth Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationDepartment of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes project is a national research registry. One of its aims is to explore sources of variation in OHCA survival outcomes. This study reports the development and validation of risk prediction models for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital handover and survival to hospital discharge. METHODS AND

resultsThe study included OHCA patients who were treated during 2014 and 2015 by emergency medical services (EMS) from seven English National Health Service ambulance services. The 2014 data were used to identify important variables and to develop the risk prediction models, which were validated using the 2015 data. Model prediction was measured by area under the curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Cox calibration regression, and Brier score. All analyses were conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Important factors included age, gender, witness/bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) combined, aetiology, and initial rhythm. Interaction effects between witness/bystander CPR with gender, aetiology and initial rhythm and between aetiology and initial rhythm were significant in both models. The survival model achieved better discrimination and overall accuracy compared with the ROSC model (AUC = 0.86 vs. 0.67, Brier score = 0.072 vs. 0.194, respectively). Calibration tests showed over- and under-estimation for the ROSC and survival models, respectively. A sensitivity analysis individually assessing Index of Multiple Deprivation scores and location in the final models substantially improved overall accuracy with inconsistent impact on discrimination.

conclusionOur risk prediction models identified and quantified important pre-EMS intervention factors determining survival outcomes in England. The survival model had excellent discrimination.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHumansRegistriesState MedicineCardiac arrestEmergency medical servicesOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPredictive modelResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID32154865
PMCPMC7962772
OpenAlexW3011103619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.