Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154565›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2020

Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.

R Anguzu, R Cusatis, N Fergestrom, A Cooper, K D Schoyer, J B Davis, J Sandlow, K E Flynn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R AnguzuInstitute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
R CusatisDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
N FergestromCenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
A CooperSocial Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
K D SchoyerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
J B DavisCayman Fertility Centre, Barbados Fertility Centre Group, Grand Cayman, KY1, 1005, Cayman Islands.
J SandlowDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
K E FlynnDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin · USDuke University · USTruman Bodden Law School · KY

Funding

Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
University of Michigan Training Program in ELSI ResearchT32HG010030 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2018 to 2022
$962k
Decision Making by Patients Seeking Care for Fertility ProblemsR21HD071332 · NICHD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FLYNN, KATHRYN E · 2012 to 2013
$411k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000055NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG010030NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD071332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are couples' decisional conflicts around family-building approaches before and after seeking a specialty consultation for infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Decisional conflict is high among couples before an initial specialty consultation for infertility; on average, women resolved decisional conflict more quickly than men. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Couples have multiple options for addressing infertility, and decisional conflict may arise due to lack of information, uncertainty about options and potential risks or challenges to personal values. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a total of 385 interviews and 405 surveys for this longitudinal, mixed-methods cohort study of 34 opposite-sex couples who sought a new reproductive specialty consultation (n = 68), who enrolled before the initial consultation and were followed over 12 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsThe in-depth, semi-structured interviews included questions about information gathering, deliberation and decision-making, and self-administered surveys included the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), at six time points over 12 months. A DCS total score of 25 is associated with implementing a decision, and higher scores indicate more decisional conflict. A systematic content analysis of interview transcripts identified major themes. Paired t tests identified differences in DCS between women and men within couples. Linear mixed models predicted changes in DCS over time, adjusting for sociodemographic and fertility-related factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The major qualitative themes were communication with partners, feeling supported and/or pressured in decision (s), changing decisions over time and ability to execute a desired decision. Average DCS scores were highest before the initial consultation. Within couples, men had significantly higher decisional conflict than women pre-consultation (48.9 versus 40.2, P = 0.037) and at 2 months (28.9 versus 22.1, P = 0.015), but differences at other time points were not significant. In adjusted models, predicted DCS scores declined over time, with women, on average, reaching the DCS threshold for implementing a decision at 2 months while for men it was not until 4 months. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a convenience sample from a single center, and generalizability may be limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsUnderstanding how couples discuss and make decisions regarding family-building could improve the delivery of patient-centered infertility care. Our findings are the first to prospectively explore decisional conflict at multiple time points in both men and women; the observed gender differences underlie the importance of supporting both partners in clinical decision-making for infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant [R21HD071332], the Research and Education Program Fund, of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment at Medical College of Wisconsin, the National Research Service Award under Grant [T32 HP10030] and the use of REDCap for data collection from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health under Grant through [8UL1TR000055]. The authors have no competing interests.

Indexed as

InfertilityChildCohort StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescouplesdecisional conflict scaledecision-makingfemaleinfertilitymalemixed methodsqualitativereproduction

Identifiers

PMID32154565
PMCPMC7105327
OpenAlexW3011652113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.