Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154515›Full record

ArticleAnnals of health law and life sciences2020

Can Clinical Genetics Laboratories be Sued for Medical Malpractice?

Alexandra L Foulkes, Jessica L Roberts, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung, Ellen Wright Clayton, Barbara Evans, Gary E Marchant

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of health law and life sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Does the law require reinterpretation and return of revised genomic results?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Does the law require reinterpretation and return of revised genomic results?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  5. GENETIC DUTIES.William and Mary law review · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra L FoulkesLaw Clerk to the Honorable Timothy D. DeGiusti. Western District of Oklahoma.
Jessica L RobertsLeonard Childs Professor of Law, Professor of Medicine, Director of the Health Law & Policy Institute. University of Houston.
Paul S AppelbaumElizabeth K. Dollard Professor, Director of the Division of Law, Ethics & Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry. Columbia University.
Wendy K ChungKennedy Family Professor of Pediatrics, Director of Clinical Genetics Program Columbia University.
Ellen Wright ClaytonProfessor of Pediatrics, Rosalind E. Franklin Professor of Genetics and Health Policy, Professor of Law. Vanderbilt University.
Barbara EvansMary Ann & Lawrence E. Faust Professor of Law, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, Director of Center on Biotechnology & Law. University of Houston.
Gary E MarchantRegents Professor of Law, Director of the Center for Law, Science and Innovation Arizona State University.

Funding

Center for Research on Ethical, Legal & Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral GeneticsRM1HG007257 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI APPELBAUM, PAUL STUART · 2018 to 2021
$4.4M
Development of recommendations and policies for genetic variant reclassificationR01HG010365 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI APPELBAUM, PAUL STUART, CHUNG, WENDY K · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010365NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG007257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32154515
PMCPMC7062367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.