ArticleKidney international reports2020
Article in Kidney international reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attitudes and beliefs regarding race-targeted genetic testing of Black people: A systematic review.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Pooled it
- Update on APOL1 and chronic kidney diseases in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- APOL1 kidney disease: a critical narrative review of molecular mechanisms, clinical heterogeneity, and the emerging therapeutic landscape.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- APOL1 risk alleles modulate T cell receptor signaling to promote allograft rejection.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Review
- Insights From Black Living Kidney Donors: An Interview Study on APOL1 Genetic Testing Experiences.Clinical transplantation · 2026Observational
- Non-HLA Genetics and Application to Living Donor Candidates.Current transplantation reports · 2025Article
- APOL1 kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.Kidney international · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Haplo-stem cell transplant post liver transplantation to cure sickle cell disease with related liver dysfunction: a case series.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Contextual factors of implementing APOL1 genetic testing into living kidney donor clinical evaluation.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Article
- Gene-Environment Interactions Among Black Adults With Kidney Failure - Not A Straight Forward Relationship.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Practical Considerations for Sharing Race-Based Genetic Research Findings.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025Article
- Genetics in Kidney Diseases.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025Review
- The application of genetic testing technology in kidney transplantation: precision matching, non-invasive monitoring and personalized management.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants.Kidney international reports · 2024Article
- CRISPR-enabled point-of-care genotyping for APOL1 genetic risk assessment.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Defining Risk in APOL1-Associated Kidney Disease: The Story is Evolving!American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024Article
- Design and Rationale of the Phase 2 Baricitinib Study in Apolipoprotein L1-Mediated Kidney Disease (JUSTICE).Kidney international reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
52 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMuch of the higher risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in African American individuals relates to ancestry-specific variation in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (
methodsAPOLLO will evaluate outcomes from 2614 deceased kidney donor-recipient pairs, as well as additional living-kidney donor-recipient pairs and unpaired deceased-donor kidneys.
resultsThe United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, American Society of Transplantation, American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, and nearly all U.S. kidney transplant programs, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), and histocompatibility laboratories are participating in this observational study. APOLLO employs a central institutional review board (cIRB) and maintains voluntary partnerships with OPOs and histocompatibility laboratories. A Community Advisory Council composed of African American individuals with a personal or family history of kidney disease has advised the NIH Project Office and Steering Committee since inception. UNOS is providing data for outcome analyses.
conclusionThis article describes unique aspects of the protocol, design, and performance of APOLLO. Results will guide use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.