ArticleHeliyon2020
A feasibility study of a complete low-cost consumer-grade brain-computer interface system.
Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- EEG-Based BCIs on Motor Imagery Paradigm Using Wearable Technologies: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Motor-Imagery EEG-Based BCIs in Wheelchair Movement and Control: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Noninvasive Electroencephalography Equipment for Assistive, Adaptive, and Rehabilitative Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- A Randomized Trial Utilizing EEG Brain Computer Interface to Improve Facial Emotion Recognition in Autistic Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Trial
- Design and Decoding of a Novel Steering Motor Imagery Paradigm for Driving Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Consumer-Grade Electroencephalogram and Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Neurofeedback Technologies for Mental Health and Wellbeing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exploiting Information in Event-Related Brain Potentials from Average Temporal Waveform, Time-Frequency Representation, and Phase Dynamics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Remote collection of electrophysiological data with brain wearables: opportunities and challenges.Bioelectronic medicine · 2023Review
- A Novel OpenBCI Framework for EEG-Based Neurophysiological Experiments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stimulus-induced narrow-band gamma oscillations in humans can be recorded using open-hardware low-cost EEG amplifier.PloS one · 2023Article
- A motor imagery vs. rest dataset with low-cost consumer grade EEG hardware.Data in brief · 2022Article
- Validation of Continuous Monitoring System for Epileptic Users in Outpatient Settings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Thinking out loud, an open-access EEG-based BCI dataset for inner speech recognition.Scientific data · 2022Article
- EEG-based spatial elements optimisation design method.Architectural intelligence · 2022Article
- Low-cost brain computer interface for everyday use.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Induction of Neural Plasticity Using a Low-Cost Open Source Brain-Computer Interface and a 3D-Printed Wrist Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- EEG-Based BCI Emotion Recognition: A Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are technologies that provide the user with an alternative way of communication. A BCI measures brain activity (e.g. EEG) and converts it into output commands. Motor imagery (MI), the mental simulation of movements, can be used as a BCI paradigm, where the movement intention of the user can be translated into a real movement, helping patients in motor recovery rehabilitation. One of the main limitations for the broad use of such devices is the high cost associated with the high-quality equipment used for capturing the biomedical signals. Different low-cost consumer-grade alternatives have emerged with the objective of bringing these systems closer to the final users. The quality of the signals obtained with such equipments has already been evaluated and found to be competitive with those obtained with well-known clinical-grade devices. However, how these consumer-grade technologies can be integrated and used for practical MI-BCIs has not yet been explored. In this work, we provide a detailed description of the advantages and disadvantages of using OpenBCI boards, low-cost sensors and open-source software for constructing an entirely consumer-grade MI-BCI system. An analysis of the quality of the signals acquired and the MI detection ability is performed. Even though communication between the computer and the OpenBCI board is not always stable and the signal quality is sometimes affected by ambient noise, we find that by means of a filter-bank based method, similar classification performances can be achieved with an MI-BCI built under low-cost consumer-grade devices as compared to when clinical-grade systems are used. By means of this work we share with the BCI community our experience on working with emerging low-cost technologies, providing evidence that an entirely low-cost MI-BCI can be built. We believe that if communication stability and artifact rejection are improved, these technologies will become a valuable alternative to clinical-grade devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.