ArticleFrontiers in public health2020
The Development of a Competency Assessment Standard for General Practitioners in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the Theory-Clinical-Community Three-Stage Training Model in General Practitioner Cultivation: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Survey of an in-Service Continuing Professional Development Program.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Temporal Analysis of Climate Change Impact on the Spread and Prevalence of Vector-Borne Diseases in Campania (2018-2023).Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Analysis of CME Participation and Credit Compliance Among Healthcare Professionals: A Five-Year Study (2019-2023) From a Hospital in Guangdong, China.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Application of practice-based learning and improvement in standardized training of general practitioners.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessment of clinical competence of graduating medical students and associated factors in Ethiopia.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The challenge of home and community older adult care in China: a survey of the capability of primary care physicians in providing geriatric healthcare services.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Current status of and future perspectives on care for cancer survivors in China.Global health & medicine · 2023Review
- Transforming global approaches to chronic disease prevention and management across the lifespan: integrating genomics, behavior change, and digital health solutions.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Designing a doctor evaluation index system for an online medical platform based on the information system success model in China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Adapting the depression component of WHO Mental Health Gap Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG.v2) for primary care in Shenzhen, China: a DELPHI study.International journal of mental health systems · 2022Article
- Real Workload-Situated Training in COVID-19 Prevention of General Practice Residents in China: A Situated Cognition Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Identifying Healthcare Professional Roles in Developing Palliative Care: A Mixed Method.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes the development of a competency assessment standard for General Practitioners in Shenzhen, China. The standard is to be used for developing and delivering the training curriculum for General Practitioners and to enable rigorous assessment of the mastery of the standards by GP trainees. The requirement for the training of General Practitioners in China is mandated by government policy requires an international standard curriculum to meet the needs of patients and the community. A modified Delphi process was employed to arrive at a curriculum consensus. An expert panel and 14 expert working groups derived from the expert panel were established to review and evaluate national and international competency standards for General Practice and develop a set of standards, through a modified Delphi methodology. Forty three experts were involved in the project. The project resulted in a detailed curriculum statement. The curriculum was then used in 2017 and 2018 where pilot examinations of GP trainees (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.