ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2019
Cardiotoxicity after cancer treatment: a process map of the patient treatment journey.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- LVEF by Multigated Acquisition Scan Compared to Other Imaging Modalities in Cardio-Oncology: a Systematic Review.Current heart failure reports · 2022Pooled it
- Risk-Adaptive Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Exercise Prescription, Multimodal Monitoring, and Implementation Pathways.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Current Cardio-Oncology Landscape Across Australia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Exploring healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of self-management of cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Long-term cancer survivor awareness and learning preferences for cardio- oncologic risks: A qualitative study.Research square · 2026Article
- Patient Journey Maps to Improve Treatment Adherence in Chronic Comorbidities: A Narrative Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Applying journey mapping and human-centered design to improve critical care delivery for patients with acute respiratory failure.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The cardio-oncology multidisciplinary team: beyond the basics.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in patients with cancer: exploring the role of physical exercise.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Unraveling the genetic blueprint of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity through systems genetics approaches.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Medication and Health Service Use in Individuals With Cancer: A Retrospective Population-Based Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Overview of Oncology: Drug-Induced Cardiac Toxicity.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Cancer Survivorship and the Significance of an Integrated Diachronic Life Course Perspective.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence: Applications in cardio-oncology and potential impact on racial disparities.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of physicians and pharmacists regarding the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular toxicity associated with cancer treatment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity and its symptoms in patients with breast cancer: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Health Literacy, Individual and Community Engagement, and Cardiovascular Risks and Disparities:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Early access to a cardio-oncology clinic in an Australian context: a qualitative exploration of patient experiences.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Cardiovascular safety profile of taxanes and vinca alkaloids: 30 years FDA registry experience.Open heart · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimCardiotoxicity is a potential complication of anticancer therapy. While guidelines have been developed to assist practitioners, an effective, evidence based clinical pathway for the treatment of cardiotoxicity has not yet been developed. The aim of this study was to describe the journey of patients who developed cardiotoxicity through the healthcare system in order to establish baseline data to inform the development and implementation of a patient-centred, evidence-based clinical pathway.
methodsMixed-methods design with quantitative and qualitative components using process mapping at 3 large medical centres in 2 states between 2010 and 2015.
resultsFifty (50) confirmed cases of cardiotoxicity were reviewed (39 medical record reviews, 7 medical record review and interviews and 4 internview only). The mean age at cancer diagnosis of this group was 53.3 years (range 6-89 years); 50% female; 30% breast cancer, 23% non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; mean chemotherapy cycles 5.2 (median 6; range 1-18); 49 (89%) presented to chemotherapy with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors; 39 (85%) had at least one modifiable risk factor and 11 (24%) had more than 4; 44 (96%) were diagnosed by echocardiogram and 27 (57%) were referred to a cardiologist (only 7 (15%) before chemotherapy). Post chemotherapy, 22 (48%) patients were referred to a multidisciplinary heart failure clinic; 8 (17%) to cardiac rehabilitation; 1 (2%) to cancer survivorship clinic and 10 (22%) to a palliative care service. There were 16 (34%) deaths during the timeframe of the study; 4 (25%) cardiac-related, 6 (38%) cancer-related, 4 (25%) due to sepsis and 2 (12%) other causes not recorded. The main concerns participants raised during the interviews were cancer professionals not discussing the potential for cardiotoxicity with them prior to treatment, nor risk modification strategies; a need for health education, particularly regarding risks for developing heart failure related to cancer treatment; and a lack of collaboration between oncologists and cardiologists.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the clinical management of cancer patients with cardiotoxicity was variable and fragmented and not patient centered. This audit establishes practice gaps that can be addressed through the design of an evidence-based clinical pathway for cancer patients with, or at risk, of cardiotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.