Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154002›Full record

ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2017

Symptom practice guide for telephone assessment of patients with cancer treatment-related cardiotoxic dyspnea: Adaptation and evaluation of acceptability.

F Kelly, S L Carroll, M Carley, S Dent, R Shorr, J Hu, R Morash, D Stacey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) practice guides - What's changed in Version 2020?Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F Kelly1School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H M5 Canada.
S L Carroll3School of Nursing, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Room HSC2J40, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1 Canada.
M Carley2Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Room 1280, Box 201B, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada.
S Dent4The Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H M5 Canada.
R Shorr5The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada.
J Hu1School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H M5 Canada.
R Morash5The Ottawa Hospital General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6 Canada.
D Stacey1School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H M5 Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity, which may manifest as heart failure (HF), can present with dyspnea. Nurses frequently assess, triage and offer self-care strategies to patients experiencing dyspnea in both the cardiology and oncology settings. However, there are no known tools available for nurses to manage patients in the setting of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity. The objective of this study was to adapt and evaluate the acceptability of an evidence-informed symptom practice guide (SPG) for use by nurses over the telephone for the assessment, triage, and management of patients experiencing dyspnea due to cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity.

methodsThe CAN-IMPLEMENT© methodology guided this descriptive study. A systematic search was conducted in four databases to identify cardio-oncology and HF guidelines and systematic reviews. Screening was conducted by two reviewers, with data extracted into a recommendation matrix from eligible guidelines and systematic reviews on: assessment criteria, medications, and/or self-care strategies to manage dyspnea. Healthcare professionals with an expertise in oncology and/or cardiology were recruited using purposeful and snowball sampling. Evaluation of acceptability of the adapted SPG was gathered through semi-structured interviews and a survey with open- and closed-ended questions. Quantitative findings and participant feedback from the interviews and the open-ended survey questions were analyzed descriptively.

resultsOf 490 citations, seven HF guidelines were identified. Evidence from these guidelines was added to the original SPG. Eleven healthcare professionals completed the interview and acceptability survey. The adapted SPG was iteratively revised three times during the interviews. The original SPG was adaptable, and participants indicated the adapted SPG was comprehensive, easy to follow, and would be useful in clinical practice.

conclusionsThis study highlights the lack of knowledge tools and available clinical practice guidelines to guide healthcare professionals to assess, triage and/or offer self-care strategies to patients with cancer treatment-related cardiotoxic dyspnea. Moreover, most nurses require assistance to differentiate among the various causes of dyspnea from oncology treatment in order to triage severity appropriately. Further research should focus on evaluating the validity of the adapted SPG in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicitySelf-management/careSymptom practice guide

Identifiers

PMID32154002
PMCPMC7048126
OpenAlexW2779211012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.