Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153992›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2020

A comparative study of two porous sponge scaffolds prepared by collagen derived from porcine skin and fish scales as burn wound dressings in a rabbit model.

Yufei Shi, Hongjian Zhang, Xin Zhang, Zhan Chen, Dan Zhao, Jun Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. [Effects of different crosslinking treatments on the properties of decellularized small intestinal submucosa porous scaffolds].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yufei ShiAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Hongjian ZhangAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Xin ZhangAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Zhan ChenAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Dan ZhaoAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Jun MaAdvanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen is widely used in biomedical applications due to its outstanding properties. In this study, highly porous sponge scaffolds were developed by using porcine skin-derived collagen (PSC) and fish scale-derived collagen (FSC), respectively. The morphology and composition of these PSC and FSC scaffolds were compared. The water uptake ratio of FSC scaffolds reached 47.8, which is 1.7 times of PSC scaffolds. The water vapour transmission rates (WVTR) of PSC and FSC scaffolds were 952.6 ± 55.5 and 1090.9 ± 77.1 g/m

Indexed as

collagenwound dressingswound healing

Identifiers

PMID32153992
PMCPMC7053267
OpenAlexW2987246022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.