Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153779›Full record

ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2020

The role of phenotype on ventilation and exercise capacity in patients affected by COPD: a retrospective study.

Rocco F Rinaldo, Michele Mondoni, Sofia Comandini, Pietro Lombardo, Beatrice Vigo, Silvia Terraneo, Pierachille Santus, Stefano Carugo, Stefano Centanni, Fabiano Di Marco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Exertional ventilation/carbon dioxide output relationship in COPD: from physiological mechanisms to clinical applications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rocco F RinaldoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Michele MondoniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Sofia ComandiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo.
Pietro LombardoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Beatrice VigoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Silvia TerraneoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Pierachille SantusDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), University of Milan, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan.
Stefano CarugoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Cardiology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Stefano CentanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan.
Fabiano Di MarcoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo.
University of Milan · ITAOL (United States) · USAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The idea of phenotype in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has evolved in the last decades, and the importance of peculiar treatment strategies has now been acknowledged. Although dyspnea and exercise limitation are hallmarks of COPD, this aspect has never been fully explored in literature in terms of disease phenotype. The aim of the present study was to explore the relevance of clinical COPD phenotypes on exercise ventilation and maximal capacity. Methods: In this observational cohort retrospective study we analyzed the data of 50 COPD patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test, categorized as emphysematous (n=29), and non-emphysematous (n=21) according to a previously validated model. Results: We found a significant difference in terms of VE/VCO Conclusions: This study extends our knowledge about the characterization of the COPD phenotypical expression of disease, showing that patients affected by emphysema are more prone to ventilatory inefficiency during exercise, and that this is likely to be an important cause of their overall reduced exercise capacity.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary exercise testCOPDemphysemaexercise capacityphenotypeventilation

Identifiers

PMID32153779
PMCPMC7037504
OpenAlexW3004749337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.