Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153729›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2020

Deep graph embedding for prioritizing synergistic anticancer drug combinations.

Peiran Jiang, Shujun Huang, Zhenyuan Fu, Zexuan Sun, Ted M Lakowski, Pingzhao Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. HANSynergy: Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network for Drug Synergy Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peiran JiangDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0J9, Canada.
Shujun HuangCollege of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0T5, Canada.
Zhenyuan FuTongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Zexuan SunDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0J9, Canada.
Ted M LakowskiCollege of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0T5, Canada.
Pingzhao HuDepartment of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0J9, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CACancerCare Manitoba · CAHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug combinations are frequently used for the treatment of cancer patients in order to increase efficacy, decrease adverse side effects, or overcome drug resistance. Given the enormous number of drug combinations, it is cost- and time-consuming to screen all possible drug pairs experimentally. Currently, it has not been fully explored to integrate multiple networks to predict synergistic drug combinations using recently developed deep learning technologies. In this study, we proposed a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) model to predict synergistic drug combinations in particular cancer cell lines. Specifically, the GCN method used a convolutional neural network model to do heterogeneous graph embedding, and thus solved a link prediction task. The graph in this study was a multimodal graph, which was constructed by integrating the drug-drug combination, drug-protein interaction, and protein-protein interaction networks. We found that the GCN model was able to correctly predict cell line-specific synergistic drug combinations from a large heterogonous network. The majority (30) of the 39 cell line-specific models show an area under the receiver operational characteristic curve (AUC) larger than 0.80, resulting in a mean AUC of 0.84. Moreover, we conducted an in-depth literature survey to investigate the top predicted drug combinations in specific cancer cell lines and found that many of them have been found to show synergistic antitumor activity against the same or other cancers

Indexed as

ACC, accuracyAUC, area under the curveCancerCell lineCNN, convolutional neural networkDDS, drug-drug synergyDNN, deep neural networkDTI, drug-target interactionER, estrogen receptorFPR, false positive rateGBM, glioblastoma multiformeGCN, graph convolutional networkGraph convolutional networkHeterogenous networkHTS, high throughput screeningPPI, protein–protein interactionRF, random forestROC, receiver operating characteristicSD, standard deviationSVM, support vector machineSynergistic drug combinationTNBC, triple negative breast cancerTPR, true positive rateXGBoost, extreme gradient boosting

Identifiers

PMID32153729
PMCPMC7052513
OpenAlexW3006386963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.