Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153655›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2020

The clinical-care focused psychological interview (CLiC): a structured tool for the assessment of cancer patients' needs.

Paola Arnaboldi, Serena Oliveri, Laura Vergani, Giulia Marton, Paolo Guiddi, Derna Busacchio, Florence Didier, Gabriella Pravettoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paola ArnaboldiPsychiatry and Medical Psychology Service (SPPM), Cantonal Socio-Psychiatric Organisation (OSC), Via Tesserete 67, 6942 Savosa, Switzerland.
Serena OliveriDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Laura VerganiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Giulia MartonDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Paolo GuiddiApplied Research Division for Cognitive Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Derna BusacchioApplied Research Division for Cognitive Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Florence DidierApplied Research Division for Cognitive Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS (IEO), via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122 Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITOrganizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating the psychosocial perspective in oncology is warranted. Here, we introduce a structured psychological intervention, the clinical-care focused psychological interview (CLiC), to address patients' needs in the relationship with health professionals, clinical pathway and decision-making process. The perceived utility and feasibility of the CLiC were evaluated in a preliminary sample of 30 patients who were candidates to undergo a radical cystectomy at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. Patients reported a very high satisfaction with the interview, because it prepared them for their upcoming surgery by gathering more information about their clinical pathway and allowed them to discover the information they still needed. 30% stated that CLiC helped them to reorganise their thoughts and 36.7% understood the role of psychological intervention in the clinical pathway. Only 20% considered the CLiC useful in helping to build their relationship with the clinical staff. Before an invasive surgery such as radical cystectomy, patients' need for information regarding the upcoming surgery seems to prevail. Knowing the future consequences and adjusting toward the disease could be paramount for patients in facing uncertainty and they might feel that creating a relationship with physicians could be a secondary issue. However, our data show that a structured psychological intervention such as the CLiC interview can collect important information for patients and healthcare professionals to develop real patient-centred care.

Indexed as

health psychologyliaison psychologypatient-centred carepsychological interventionpsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID32153655
PMCPMC7032941
OpenAlexW3000222318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.