Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153463›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Young Children's Indiscriminate Helping Behavior Toward a Humanoid Robot.

Dorothea U Martin, Madeline I MacIntyre, Conrad Perry, Georgia Clift, Sonja Pedell, Jordy Kaufman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothea U MartinSwinburne BabyLab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Madeline I MacIntyreSwinburne BabyLab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Conrad PerrySchool of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Georgia CliftSwinburne BabyLab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Sonja PedellSwinburne Future Self and Design Living Lab, Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.
Jordy KaufmanSwinburne BabyLab, Department of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young children help others in a range of situations, relatively indiscriminate of the characteristics of those they help. Recent results have suggested that young children's helping behavior extends even to humanoid robots. However, it has been unclear how characteristics of robots would influence children's helping behavior. Considering previous findings suggesting that certain robot features influence adults' perception of and their behavior toward robots, the question arises of whether young children's behavior and perception would follow the same principles. The current study investigated whether two key characteristics of a humanoid robot (animate autonomy and friendly expressiveness) would affect children's instrumental helping behavior and their perception of the robot as an animate being. Eighty-two 3-year-old children participated in one of four experimental conditions manipulating a robot's ostensible animate autonomy (high/low) and friendly expressiveness (friendly/neutral). Helping was assessed in an out-of-reach task and animacy ratings were assessed in a post-test interview. Results suggested that both children's helping behavior, as well as their perception of the robot as animate, were unaffected by the robot's characteristics. The findings indicate that young children's helping behavior extends largely indiscriminately across two important characteristics. These results increase our understanding of the development of children's altruistic behavior and animate-inanimate distinctions. Our findings also raise important ethical questions for the field of child-robot interaction.

Indexed as

altruismanimacychild-robot interactionhelpinghuman-robot interactionprosocial behaviorsocial robotics

Identifiers

PMID32153463
PMCPMC7047927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.