ArticleESC heart failure2020
Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end-stage of renal disease.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure patients with end-stage kidney disease on maintenance dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in improving cardiac function and blood pressure in dialysis patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of a controlled study of levosimendan combined with Sacubitril/Valsartan for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in China.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan combined with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after reperfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition Combined with Enteral Nutritional Therapy on Cardiac Performance and Inflammatory Burden in Hemodialysis-Associated Heart Failure: Clinical and Experimental Evidence.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026Trial
- Bibliometric analysis of sacubitril/valsartan in the management of chronic kidney disease (2013-2025).Renal failure · 2026Review
- Management Strategies for Congestive Heart Failure in Chronic Kidney Disease: Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Can sacubitril/valsartan enhance sleep quality and reduce daytime dysfunction in HFrEF patients?Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in end-stage renal disease patients with heart failure: a review.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Impact of sacubitril/valsartan on adverse clinical events in heart failure with end-stage renal disease patients-a real life nationwide investigation.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in concurrent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and kidney failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The association of vascular access flow with sacubitril/valsartan and left ventricular ejection fraction in hemodialysis patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Cardiac remodelling in the era of the recommended four pillars heart failure medical therapy.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan in Dialysis Patients: Update on Current Perspectives.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Review
- Sacubitril/Valsartan for Blood Pressure Lowering in Non-Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3-5 Patients With Hypertension: A Multicenter Clinical Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Observational
- Efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in Maintenance Hemodialysis patients with hypertension:A retrospective study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease: a focus on therapies and interventions.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSacubitril/valsartan (SV) reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACE-I to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial. However, this trial excluded patients with end stage of renal disease (ESRD); thus, the efficacy and safety of SV in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with ESRD remains uncertain. METHODS AND
resultsWe retrospectively analysed the clinical and laboratory data of 501 HFrEF patients who administered with SV from March 2017 to April 2019 in a single tertiary university hospital. A total of 23 HFrEF patients with ESRD on dialysis [58.3% non-ischaemic heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 29.7 ± 4.4%] were included in this study. At baseline and follow-up visit, we evaluated cardiovascular biomarkers such as high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT), soluble ST2 (sST2), echocardiographic parameters, and clinical and adverse events. The mean dose of SV was 90 ± 43 mg/day at baseline and 123 ± 62 mg/day at last follow-up (follow-up duration: median 132 days). The level of hsTnT was significantly reduced from 236.2 ± 355.3 to 97.0 ± 14.0 pg/mL (P = 0.002), and the sST2 level was significantly reduced from 40.4 ± 44.0 to 19.6 ± 14.1 ng/mL (P = 0.005). LVEF was significantly improved from 29.7 ± 4.4% to 40.8 ± 10.4% (P = 0.002). During the follow-up, up-titration, down-titration, and maintenance of SV dosing were observed in 7 (30%), 5 (21.7%), and 11 patients (47.8%), respectively. SV down-titration group had adverse events including symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) (n = 4) and dizziness (n = 1), but they did not discontinue SV therapy.
conclusionsWe found that SV could safely reduce the hsTnT and sST2 levels and improve LVEF in HFrEF patients with ESRD. As far as we know, this is the first study to show the efficacy and safety of SV in HFrEF with ESRD on dialysis. Larger prospective, long-term follow-up study should be warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.