Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32153080›Full record

SynthesisNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2020

Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice.

Paul A Lehur, Michael Sørensen, Thomas C Dudding, Charles H Knowles, Stefan de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Klaus E Matzel, European SNM Expert Group

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pathways and parameters of sacral neuromodulation in rats.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Faecal incontinence is associated with an impaired rectosigmoid brake and improved by sacral neuromodulation.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Sacral neuromodulation of bladder underactivity induced by prolonged pudendal afferent firing in cats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul A LehurColoproctology Unit, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8943-7062
Michael SørensenDepartment of Surgical and Medical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas C DuddingDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Charles H KnowlesCentre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stefan de WachterDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Stefan EngelbergMedtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5903-1037
Klaus E MatzelChirurgische Klinik, Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
European SNM Expert Group

Funding

Medtronic
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure.

objectiveStandardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed.

methodsSystematic literature review and collective clinical experience report.

resultsThe basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step-by-step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented.

conclusionsProgramming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow-up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectric Stimulation TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansLumbosacral PlexusSacrumTreatment OutcomeBasic programmingelectric stimulationfecal incontinencepelvic organ dysfunctionsacral neuromodulationurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID32153080
PMCPMC7818413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.