Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152960›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2020

Proposed Definition of Experimental Secondary Ischemia for Mouse Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Jasper Hans van Lieshout, Serge Marbacher, Sajjad Muhammad, Hieronymus D Boogaarts, Ronald H M A Bartels, Maxine Dibué, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Daniel Hänggi, Marcel A Kamp

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jasper Hans van LieshoutDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Jasper.vanLieshout@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Serge MarbacherDepartment of Neurosurgery c/o Neuro Research Office, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 1, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Sajjad MuhammadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hieronymus D BoogaartsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboudumc Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ronald H M A BartelsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboudumc Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maxine DibuéDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Jakob SteigerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Daniel HänggiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Marcel A KampDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, D-40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERadboud University Medical Center · NLKantonsspital Aarau · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 114024130ZonMw 114024137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inconsistency in outcome parameters for delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) makes it difficult to compare results between mouse studies, in the same way inconsistency in outcome parameters in human studies has for long obstructed adequate comparison. The absence of an established definition may in part be responsible for the failed translational results. The present article proposes a standardized definition for DCI in experimental mouse models, which can be used as outcome measure in future animal studies. We used a consensus-building approach to propose a definition for "experimental secondary ischemia" (ESI) in experimental mouse subarachnoid hemorrhage that can be used as an outcome measure in preclinical studies. We propose that the outcome measure should be as follows: occurrence of focal neurological impairment or a general neurological impairment compared with a control group and that neurological impairment should occur secondarily following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) induction compared with an initial assessment following SAH induction. ESI should not be used if the condition can be explained by general anesthesia or if other means of assessments sufficiently explain function impairment. If neurological impairment cannot reliably be evaluated, due to scientific setup. Verification of a significant secondary impairment of the cerebral perfusion compared with a control group is mandatory. This requires longitudinal examination in the same animal. The primary aim is that ESI should be distinguished from intervention-related ischemia or neurological deficits, in order establish a uniform definition for experimental SAH in mice that is in alignment with outcome measures in human studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaCerebral InfarctionHumansIschemiaMiceOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialDelayed cerebral ischemiaExperimental subarachnoid hemorrhageOutcome parameter

Identifiers

PMID32152960
PMCPMC7496000
OpenAlexW3009225382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.