SynthesisClinical rheumatology2020
A systematic review of internet-based information for individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon and patients with systemic sclerosis.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of self-management program performed via telerehabilitation on occupational performance and satisfaction of individuals with systemic sclerosis.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2025Article
- Professionalism vs. engagement: quality of SSc information on WeChat.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A Scleroderma and Raynaud's UK (SRUK) national survey to explore rheumatologists' awareness, approaches to diagnosis and management and training needs within systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- Online availability of antibiotics from within the UK: shifting patterns from 2016 to 2023.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Attitudes and barriers to pulmonary arterial hypertension screening in systemic sclerosis patients: A survey of UK-based rheumatologists.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- Oral health education for systemic sclerosis patients: A booklet report.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Digital health information on autoinflammatory diseases: a YouTube quality analysis.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Practical management of Raynaud's phenomenon - a primer for practicing physicians.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2022Review
- An Overview of Different Techniques for Improving the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension Secondary in Systemic Sclerosis Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Patient and healthcare professional eHealth literacy and needs for systemic sclerosis support: a mixed methods study.RMD open · 2021Article
- Impact of Covid-19 on clinical care and lived experience of systemic sclerosis: An international survey from EURORDIS-Rare Diseases Europe.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2021Article
- Web-based information on the treatment of the mouth in systemic sclerosis.BMC rheumatology · 2020Article
- Raynaud's phenomenon.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients are increasingly using internet-based information to inform healthcare utilization and treatment decisions. Our aim was to examine the quality and readability of internet-based information relating to Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic review of three commonly used search engines (Google®, Yahoo®, and Bing®) using the terms "Raynaud's phenomenon" and "systemic sclerosis" separately. The first 30 websites per search engine were examined. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire and readability by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG Index, Coleman-Liau index, and Flesch Reading Ease score.
resultsFifty-two studies (30 RP and 22 SSc) were included after duplicates and exclusion criteria were applied. The overall quality of information was low for both SSc and RP (1.99 & 2.21), including in relation to reliability of the literature and information on treatment choices. Readability for RP and SSc was also poor (i.e., the texts were difficult to read) across all of the four methods examined.
conclusionOverall, RP and SSc internet-based information is of low quality and inadequate readability. The RP and SSc international community should strongly consider developing an information standard for internet-based resources for healthcare users. KEY POINTS: • Patients with SSc and RP are increasingly using internet/online sources of information and support. • RP represents an important opportunity for the early diagnosis of SSc. • The overall quality and readability of internet-based RP and SSc information is poor. • Internet-based RP and SSc information requires improvement to facilitate early diagnosis and inform shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.