Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152916›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2020

A systematic review of internet-based information for individuals with Raynaud's phenomenon and patients with systemic sclerosis.

Vikrant Devgire, Andreas Flores Martin, Lorraine McKenzie, Robert D Sandler, Michael Hughes

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Raynaud's phenomenon.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vikrant DevgireDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.
Andreas Flores MartinDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.
Lorraine McKenzieCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Robert D SandlerDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK.
Michael HughesDepartment of Rheumatology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2JF, UK. Michael.hughes-6@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3361-4909
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients are increasingly using internet-based information to inform healthcare utilization and treatment decisions. Our aim was to examine the quality and readability of internet-based information relating to Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review of three commonly used search engines (Google®, Yahoo®, and Bing®) using the terms "Raynaud's phenomenon" and "systemic sclerosis" separately. The first 30 websites per search engine were examined. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire and readability by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG Index, Coleman-Liau index, and Flesch Reading Ease score.

resultsFifty-two studies (30 RP and 22 SSc) were included after duplicates and exclusion criteria were applied. The overall quality of information was low for both SSc and RP (1.99 & 2.21), including in relation to reliability of the literature and information on treatment choices. Readability for RP and SSc was also poor (i.e., the texts were difficult to read) across all of the four methods examined.

conclusionOverall, RP and SSc internet-based information is of low quality and inadequate readability. The RP and SSc international community should strongly consider developing an information standard for internet-based resources for healthcare users. KEY POINTS: • Patients with SSc and RP are increasingly using internet/online sources of information and support. • RP represents an important opportunity for the early diagnosis of SSc. • The overall quality and readability of internet-based RP and SSc information is poor. • Internet-based RP and SSc information requires improvement to facilitate early diagnosis and inform shared decision-making.

Indexed as

ComprehensionInternetConsumer Health InformationHumansRaynaud DiseaseReadingScleroderma, SystemicSearch EngineInformationInternetQualityRaynaud’s phenomenonReadabilitySystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32152916
OpenAlexW3010361886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.