Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152909›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle.

Yetunde Ibrahim, Greg Stoddard, Erica Johnstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yetunde IbrahimDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, 675 Arapeen Drive, Suite 205, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. Yetunde.ibrahim@hsc.utah.edu.
Greg StoddardDivision of Epidemiology, Study Design and Biostatistics Center, University of Utah Health Center for Clinical and Translational Science, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84122, USA.
Erica JohnstoneDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, 675 Arapeen Drive, Suite 205, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify factors predictive of having supernumerary embryos in a fresh IVF cycle and create a prediction model for clinical counseling.

methodsWe utilized a multivariable Poisson regression to identify predictive factors and then entered these into a logistic regression model, calculating a risk index for each significant variable. The final model was tested using a receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsA total of 60,616 fresh transfer cycles were reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology in 2014. Of these, 47.17% produced supernumerary embryos. A multivariate Poisson regression identified factors predictive of having supernumerary embryos, with age and AMH being the most predictive. Clinical prediction models were developed with acceptable and excellent discrimination. 23.5% of our cohort did not achieve a live birth following their fresh transfer and had excess embryos cryopreserved for future attempts.

conclusionOur study suggests that in a minority of fresh IVF cycles in the USA, the fresh transfer is not successful, and there are excess embryos cryopreserved for future use. The likelihood of excess embryos beyond those that would be transferred can be predicted with satisfactory precision prior to initiation of the cycle and with improved precision after fresh embryo transfer. Providing patients with a realistic estimate of their chances of having excess embryos at an initial IVF consult especially those with suspected poor prognosis can be beneficial in determining whether to proceed with multiple embryo banking cycles as opposed to proceeding with a fresh transfer, and whether to opt for an enhanced embryo selection technique such as preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdultAneuploidyCryopreservationEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic CounselingHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy RateReproductive Techniques, AssistedCounseling toolEmbryo selectionFresh IVF cyclePrediction modelPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID32152909
PMCPMC7244666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.