Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152841›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): Results of a Modified Delphi Study.

Almino C Ramos, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Kamal Mahawar, Wendy Brown, Lilian Kow, Kevin P White, Scott Shikora, IFSO Consensus Conference Contributors

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06077955 (The Incidence of Gastrojejunostomy Ulceration After MGB-OAGB), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
19.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06077955 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Incidence of Gastrojejunostomy Ulceration After MGB-OAGB: Comparison of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Techniques of Anastomosis Formation. Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of HealthRan2023 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsUlcer PepticArmsMini-gastric bypass with stapled anastomosis, Mini-gastric bypass with hand-sewn anastomosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Almino C RamosGastro-Obeso-Center Institute of Metabolic Optimization, São Paulo, Brazil. ramos.almino@gmail.com.
Jean-Marc ChevallierHopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Kamal MahawarSunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK.
Wendy BrownDepartment of Surgery Alfred Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Lilian KowAdelaide Bariatric Centre, Flinders Private Hospital, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Kevin P WhiteScience Right Research Consulting, London, Ontario, Canada.
Scott ShikoraBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
IFSO Consensus Conference Contributors
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USFlinders Private Hospital · AUHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRGastro Obeso Center · BRSunderland Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) is currently the third performed primary bariatric surgical procedure worldwide. However, the procedure is hampered by numerous controversies and there is considerable variability in surgical technique, patient selection, and pre- and postoperative care among the surgeons performing this procedure. This paper reports the results of a modified Delphi consensus study organized by the International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO).

methodsFifty-two internationally recognized bariatric experts from 28 countries convened for voting on 90 consensus statements over two rounds to identify those on which consensus could be reached. Inter-voter agreement of ≥ 70% was considered consensus, with voting participation ≥ 80% considered a robust vote.

resultsAt least 70% consensus was achieved for 65 of the 90 questions (72.2% of the items), 61 during the first round of voting and an additional four in the second round. Where consensus was reached on a binary agree/disagree or yes/no item, there was agreement with the statement presented in 53 of 56 instances (94.6%). Where consensus was reached on a statement where options favorable versus unfavorable to OAGB-MGB were provided, including statements in which OAGB-MGB was compared to another procedure, the response option favorable to OAGB-MGB was selected in 13 of 23 instances (56.5%).

conclusionAlthough there is general agreement that the OAGB-MGB is an effective and usually safe option for the management of patients with obesity or severe obesity, numerous areas of non-consensus remain in its use. Further empirical data are needed.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassMetabolic DiseasesObesity, MorbidDelphi TechniqueHumansObesityWeight LossConsensus statementDelphiMini-gastric bypassObesityOne-anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID32152841
OpenAlexW3010594143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.