Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152823›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2021

Optimal Radiotherapy Dose in Anal Cancer: Trends in Prescription Dose and Association with Survival.

Nishant K Shah, Muhammad M Qureshi, Michael A Dyer, Minh Tam Truong, Kimberley S Mak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Recent Advances in the Management of Anal Cancer.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nishant K ShahBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Muhammad M QureshiBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Michael A DyerBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Minh Tam TruongBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Kimberley S MakBoston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. kimberley.mak@bmc.org.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDefinitive chemoradiotherapy represents a standard of care treatment for localized anal cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≥ 45 Gy and escalation to 50.4-59 Gy for advanced disease. Per RTOG 0529, 50.4 Gy was prescribed for early-stage disease (cT1-2N0), and 54 Gy for locally advanced cancers (cT3-T4 and/or node positive). We assessed patterns of care and overall survival (OS) with respect to the RT dose.

methodsThe National Cancer Database identified patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2015 treated with chemoradiotherapy. Patients were stratified by RT dose: 40-< 45, 45-< 50, 50-54, and > 54-60 Gy. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox regression modeling.

resultsA total of 10,524 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 40.7 months. The most commonly prescribed RT dose was 54 Gy. On multivariate analysis, RT doses of 40-< 45 Gy were associated with worse OS vs. 50-54 Gy (HR 1.68 [1.40-2.03], P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in OS for patients who received 45-< 50 or > 54-60 Gy compared with 50-54 Gy. For early-stage disease, there was no significant association between RT dose and OS. For locally advanced disease, 45-< 54 Gy was associated with worse survival vs. 54 Gy (HR 1.18 [1.04-1.34], P = 0.009), but no significant difference was detected comparing > 54-60 Gy vs. 54 Gy (HR 1.08 [0.97-1.22], P = 0.166).

conclusionsFor patients with localized anal cancer, RT doses of ≥ 45 Gy were associated with improved OS. For locally advanced disease, 54 Gy but not > 54 Gy was associated with improved OS.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiation OncologyRadiotherapy DosageSurvival RateYoung AdultAnal cancerChemoradiationRadiation therapyRadiotherapyRadiotherapy dose

Identifiers

PMID32152823
OpenAlexW3009321060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.