Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152811›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2020

Inter-study repeatability of circumferential strain and diastolic strain rate by CMR tagging, feature tracking and tissue tracking in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Sheraz A Nazir, Abhishek M Shetye, Jamal N Khan, Anvesha Singh, Jayanth R Arnold, Iain Squire, Gerry P McCann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Localized strain characterization of cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy using novel 4D kinematic analysis of cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheraz A NazirDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK. sn191@le.ac.uk.
Abhishek M ShetyeDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Jamal N KhanDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Anvesha SinghDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Jayanth R ArnoldDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Iain SquireDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Gerry P McCannDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and the National Institute for Health for Research (NIHR) Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QF, UK.
Glenfield Hospital · GBNIHR Leicester Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain assessment allows accurate evaluation of myocardial function and mechanics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Strain using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has traditionally been assessed with tagging but limitations of this technique have led to more widespread use of alternative methods, which may be more robust. We compared the inter-study repeatability of circumferential global peak-systolic strain (Ecc) and peak-early diastolic strain rate (PEDSR) derived by tagging with values obtained using novel cine-based software: Feature Tracking (FT) (TomTec, Germany) and Tissue Tracking (TT) (Circle cvi

Indexed as

FemaleHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSystoleFeature trackingRepeatabilitySTEMITaggingTissue tracking

Identifiers

PMID32152811
PMCPMC7228913
OpenAlexW3010504176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.