Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152764›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Nutrition support during allogeneic stem cell transplantation: evidence versus practice.

Sarah Andersen, Merrilyn Banks, Teresa Brown, Nicholas Weber, Glen Kennedy, Judy Bauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in auto-HCT: a randomized controlled trial on clinical outcomes and gut microbiome dynamics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. A liberalized diet does not improve caloric intake during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplants: A prospective randomized controlled trial.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah AndersenDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia. sarah.andersen@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9200-8186
Merrilyn BanksDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Teresa BrownDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Nicholas WeberDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Glen KennedyDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Judy BauerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Foundation n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnteral (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) is frequently required during allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT), however there is limited consensus on the appropriate mode and timing of nutrition support commencement. This study aimed to investigate current nutrition support practices in Australian allogeneic transplant units and explore barriers and enablers to the use of EN and PN.

methodsAll Australian adult allogeneic HPCT units were eligible to participate. A survey tool was developed, and phone interview with each unit dietitian was completed to explore current nutrition support and perceived barriers and enablers to provision of nutrition care.

resultsA total of 12 (100%) units agreed to participate. Six (50%) units reported using PN as standard care and six use EN routinely for one or more conditioning regimens. All units using EN place feeding tubes proactively with tolerance of EN reported at 50-95%. The most frequently reported barriers to the use of EN include perception of poor EN tolerance, medical team preference for PN, gastrointestinal symptoms and thrombocytopenia. Reported barriers to the use of PN include fluid overload, elevated liver enzymes, patient apprehension about PN commencement, medical team uncertainty if PN is required and patients approaching engraftment.

conclusionThere is wide variation in the mode and timing of nutrition support provided to patients undergoing allogeneic HPCT. Clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect recent findings on EN use and incorporate strategies to optimise EN tolerance. This will assist in standardising practice and facilitate evidence-based nutrition care.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaEnteral NutritionHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional SupportParenteral NutritionSurveys and QuestionnairesTransplantation ConditioningAllogeneic stem cell transplantEnteral nutritionNutrition supportParenteral nutrition

Identifiers

PMID32152764
OpenAlexW3009366012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.