Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152718›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography classification of diabetic macular edema: a new proposal to clinical practice.

Serra Arf, Isil Sayman Muslubas, Mumin Hocaoglu, Mehmet Giray Ersoz, Hakan Ozdemir, Murat Karacorlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serra ArfIstanbul Retina Institute, Hakkı Yeten Cad. Unimed Center No: 19/7 Fulya - Şişli, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Isil Sayman MuslubasIstanbul Retina Institute, Hakkı Yeten Cad. Unimed Center No: 19/7 Fulya - Şişli, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mumin HocaogluIstanbul Retina Institute, Hakkı Yeten Cad. Unimed Center No: 19/7 Fulya - Şişli, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Giray ErsozIstanbul Retina Institute, Hakkı Yeten Cad. Unimed Center No: 19/7 Fulya - Şişli, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan OzdemirDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bezmialem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Murat KaracorluIstanbul Retina Institute, Hakkı Yeten Cad. Unimed Center No: 19/7 Fulya - Şişli, 34349, Istanbul, Turkey. mkaracorlu@gmail.com.
Istanbul Retina Institute (Turkey) · TRBezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo classify the types of diabetic macular edema (DME) and evaluate its morphological features on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and determine correlations between visual acuity and OCT findings.

methodsWe assessed 406 eyes of 309 patients with a diagnosis of DME retrospectively. Three types based on SD-OCT were identified: diffuse macular edema, cystoid macular edema, and cystoid degeneration. Morphological features such as serous macular detachment (SMD), vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMAI), hard exudates, photoreceptor status, and correlations between visual acuity and those morphological features were also evaluated by SD-OCT.

resultsThe most common type of DME was cystoid edema (68.5%). No statistically significant difference was found between groups in sex (P = 0.40), type of diabetes (P = 0.50), or diabetic retinopathy (P = 0.78). However, the duration of symptoms and BCVA was significantly lower in the group with cystoid degeneration compared with the group with cystoid edema (P < 0.001) and the group with diffuse macular edema (P < 0.001). In the group with cystoid degeneration compared with the groups with cystoid and diffuse edema, the central fovea and central subfield were significantly thicker (both (P < 0.001), the subfoveal choroid was significantly thinner (P = 0.049), rate of serous macular detachment was significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the rate of outer retinal damage was significantly higher (P < 0.001).

conclusionsCystoid macular degeneration, which is consistent with poor functional and morphological outcomes, should be differentiated from cystoid macular edema. Serous macular detachment, which is mostly seen in eyes with early stages of DME, should be evaluated as an accompanying morphological finding rather than a type of DME.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetic RetinopathyExudates and TransudatesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyHumansMacula LuteaMacular EdemaMaleMiddle AgedPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateRetinal DetachmentRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceCystoid macular degenerationCystoid macular edemaDiabetic macular edemaDiffuse macular edemaSD-OCTSerous macular detachment

Identifiers

PMID32152718
OpenAlexW3010183957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.