Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152691›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

A computer tablet software can quantify the deviation of scapula medial border from the thoracic wall during clinical assessment of scapula dyskinesis.

Trifon Totlis, Dimitrios Kitridis, Konstantinos Tsikopoulos, Anastasios Georgoulis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Trifon TotlisThessaloniki Minimally Invasive Surgery (The-MIS) Orthopaedic Center, St. Luke's Hospital, 55236, Thessaloniki, Greece. totlis@auth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5729-7755
Dimitrios Kitridis1st Orthopaedic Department, George Papanikolaou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos Tsikopoulos2nd Orthopaedic Department, Papageorgiou University Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anastasios GeorgoulisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Center, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRPapageorgiou General Hospital · GRUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine New Researcher Grant 2017-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAim of this study is to establish an objective and easily applicable method that will allow clinicians to quantitatively assess scapular dyskinesis during clinical examination using a computer tablet software. Hypothesis is that dyskinetic scapulae present greater motion-deviation from the thoracic wall-compared to the non-dyskinetic ones and that the software will be able to record those differences.

methodsTwenty-five patients and 19 healthy individuals were clinically evaluated for the presence of dyskinesis or not. According to the clinical diagnosis, the observations were divided into three groups; A. Dyskinetic scapulae with symptoms (n = 25), B. Contralateral non-dyskinetic scapulae without symptoms (n = 25), C. Healthy control scapulae (n = 38). Then, all individuals were tested using a tablet with the PIVOT™ image-based analysis software (PIVOT, Impellia, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The motion produced by the scapula medial border and inferior angle deviation from the thoracic wall was recorded.

resultsThe deviation of the medial border and inferior angle of the scapula from the thoracic wall was 24.6 ± 7.3 mm in Group A, 14.7 ± 4.9 mm in Group B, and 12.4 ± 5.2 mm in Group C. The motion recorded in the dyskinetic scapulae group was significantly greater than both the contralateral non-dyskinetic scapulae group (p < 0.01) and the healthy control scapulae group (p < 0.01).

conclusionThe PIVOT™ software was efficient to detect significant differences in the motion between dyskinetic and non-dyskinetic scapulae. This system can support the clinical diagnosis of dyskinesis with a numeric value, which not only contributes to scapula dyskinesis grading but also to the evaluation of the progress and efficacy of the applied treatment, thus providing a feedback to the clinician and the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, laboratory study.

Indexed as

Computers, HandheldSoftwareAdolescentAdultDyskinesiasFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementScapulaThoracic WallYoung AdultFunctional anatomyKinematicsPhysical examinationQuantitative measurementScapular dyskinesiaShoulderSubacromial impingement

Identifiers

PMID32152691
OpenAlexW3012469524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.