ArticleNeuroradiology2020
Cerebral hemodynamics associated with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense vessels in patients with extracranial carotid artery stenosis.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense vessels (FHVs) are linked to sluggish or disordered blood flow. The purpose of this study is to compare FHVs with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) findings and cerebral hemodynamic changes on acetazolamide challenge SPECT and to determine the clinical and imaging metrics associated with FHVs in patients with extracranial carotid artery stenosis (ECAS).
methodsThe subjects were patients with chronic ECAS who underwent carotid artery stenting in our department between March 2011 and October 2018. Relationships of FHVs with age, sex, medical history, cerebral angiographic findings using DSA, and quantitative values of cerebral blood flow (CBF) were examined. The resting CBF (rCBF) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the middle cerebral artery territory were measured quantitatively using SPECT with acetazolamide challenge. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of FHVs.
resultsOf 173 patients included, 92 (53.2%) had FHVs. Patients with FHVs had more severe stenosis (P < 0.01) and more leptomeningeal collateral vessels (P < 0.01). FHV-positive cases had significantly reduced CVR compared with FHV-negative cases (P < 0.01), although there was no significant difference in rCBF between FHV-positive and FHV-negative cases. Logistic regression analysis showed that ipsilateral rCBF and ipsilateral CVR were significant predictors for FHVs (P < 0.01).
conclusionIn patients with ECAS, cerebral hemodynamic metrics, especially ipsilateral rCBF and ipsilateral CVR, are associated with the presence of FHVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.