Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152531›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2020

Chance and necessity in the pleiotropic consequences of adaptation for budding yeast.

Elizabeth R Jerison, Alex N Nguyen Ba, Michael M Desai, Sergey Kryazhimskiy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interaction between mutation type and gene pleiotropy drives parallel evolution in the laboratory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of cross-tolerance to metals in yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth R JerisonDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alex N Nguyen BaDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael M DesaiDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. mdesai@oeb.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-1150
Sergey KryazhimskiyDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. skryazhi@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9128-8705
Harvard University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Microbial Adaptation and the Statistics of Epistasis and PleiotropyR01GM104239 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DESAI, MICHAEL M · 2013 to 2025
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations that a population accumulates during evolution in one 'home' environment may cause fitness gains or losses in other environments. Such pleiotropic fitness effects determine the evolutionary fate of the population in variable environments and can lead to ecological specialization. It is unclear how the pleiotropic outcomes of evolution are shaped by the intrinsic randomness of the evolutionary process and by the deterministic variation in selection pressures across environments. Here, to address this question, we evolved 20 replicate populations of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 11 laboratory environments and measured their fitness across multiple conditions. We found that evolution led to diverse pleiotropic fitness gains and losses, driven by multiple types of mutations. Approximately 60% of this variation is explained by the home environment of a clone and the most common parallel genetic changes, whereas about 40% is attributed to the stochastic accumulation of mutations whose pleiotropic effects are unpredictable. Although populations are typically specialized to their home environment, generalists also evolved in almost all of the conditions. Our results suggest that the mutations that accumulate during evolution incur a variety of pleiotropic costs and benefits with different probabilities. Thus, whether a population evolves towards a specialist or a generalist phenotype is heavily influenced by chance.

Indexed as

SaccharomycetalesAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalPhenotypeProbability

Identifiers

PMID32152531
PMCPMC8063891
OpenAlexW3009693722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.