Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152504›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020

Lactic acidosis induces resistance to the pan-Akt inhibitor uprosertib in colon cancer cells.

Emily M E Barnes, Yitao Xu, Adrian Benito, Lili Herendi, Alexandros P Siskos, Eric O Aboagye, Anke Nijhuis, Hector C Keun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Lactate and lactylation in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily M E BarnesCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Yitao XuCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Adrian BenitoCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Lili HerendiCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Alexandros P SiskosCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Eric O AboagyeCancer Imaging Centre, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Anke NijhuisCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Hector C KeunCancer Metabolism & Systems Toxicology Group, Division of Cancer, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, W12 0NN, UK. h.keun@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-8851
Hammersmith Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16584Medical Research Council MR/N020782/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAkt signalling regulates glycolysis and drives the Warburg effect in cancer, thus decreased glucose utilisation is a pharmacodynamic marker of Akt inhibition. However, cancer cells can utilise alternative nutrients to glucose for energy such as lactate, which is often elevated in tumours together with increased acidity. We therefore hypothesised that lactic acidosis may confer resistance to Akt inhibition.

methodsThe effect of the pan-Akt inhibitor uprosertib (GSK2141795), on HCT116 and LS174T colon cancer cells was evaluated in the presence and absence of lactic acid in vitro. Expression of downstream Akt signalling proteins was determined using a phosphokinase array and immunoblotting. Metabolism was assessed using

resultsLactic acid-induced resistance to uprosertib was characterised by increased cell survival and reduced apoptosis. Uprosertib treatment reduced Akt signalling and glucose uptake irrespective of lactic acid supplementation. However, incorporation of lactate carbon and enhanced respiration was maintained in the presence of uprosertib and lactic acid. Inhibiting lactate transport or oxidative phosphorylation was sufficient to potentiate apoptosis in the presence of uprosertib.

conclusionsLactic acidosis confers resistance to uprosertib, which can be reversed by inhibiting lactate transport or oxidative metabolism.

Indexed as

Acidosis, LacticAngiogenesis InhibitorsApoptosisColonic NeoplasmsDiaminesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGlucoseGlycolysisHCT116 CellsHumansLactic AcidOncogene Protein v-aktOxidative PhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesSignal TransductionAngiogenesis InhibitorsDiaminesGlucoseGSK2141795Lactic AcidOncogene Protein v-aktProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID32152504
PMCPMC7188671
OpenAlexW3010275416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.