ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020
Global health training during neonatal fellowship: fellow and program director perspectives.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Threats to neonatologists' professional identity formation: ethical implications of condensing neonatal-perinatal fellowship.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- A model for global health education through the Ethiopian newborn quality improvement ECHO initiative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Recent interest in global health among American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Specialists.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Article
- Global Health Education in US Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowships.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study explored the availability and perception of Global Health (GH) training opportunities in US-based Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellowship programs. STUDY
designElectronic surveys, containing discrete choice and open-ended questions, were distributed to current and recent fellows and to Program Directors (PDs).
resultsFifty-eight PDs and ninety-eight fellows completed the survey. Fellows reported declining GH participation from 48% in medical school to 21% in fellowship. Among the 42% of fellows reporting GH opportunities at their programs, 30% personally participated. Fewer than 30% of these programs offer structured classroom or online learning; 10% offer research opportunities. 72% of fellows stated that GH availability is moderately to extremely important, compared with 58% of PDs. PDs cited cost, scheduling, mentorship, and lack of suitable global partners as barriers to supporting fellows in GH.
conclusionNPM fellows place high importance on GH opportunities during fellowship, but only a minority engage in GH work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32152489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.