Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152488›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Blinded randomized crossover trial: Skin-to-skin care vs. sucrose for preterm neonatal pain.

Somashekhar Nimbalkar, Vivek V Shukla, Vishwa Chauhan, Ajay Phatak, Dipen Patel, Apurva Chapla, Archana Nimbalkar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sucrose analgesia for heel-lance procedures in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Effect of Non-Pharmacological Methods in the Reduction of Neonatal Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Somashekhar NimbalkarPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-2819
Vivek V ShuklaPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India. viveks3985@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-1049
Vishwa ChauhanPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Ajay PhatakPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Dipen PatelPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Apurva ChaplaPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Archana NimbalkarPramukhswami Medical College, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Pramukhswami Medical College · INUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare skin-to-skin care (SSC) and oral sucrose for preterm neonatal pain control.

methodsPreterm neonates (28-36 weeks gestation) requiring heel-stick were eligible. In group-A, SSC was given 15-min before first heel-stick, and sucrose was given 2-min before second heel-stick. In group-B, the sequence was reversed. Blinded premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score assessment was done at 0, 1, and 5-min of heel-stick by two assessors.

resultsA hundred neonates were enrolled. The inter-rater agreement for the PIPP score was good. The behavior state component was significantly lower in the sucrose group at all assessment points. The mean (SD) difference between 1-min and 0 min was similar [SSC 3.58(3.16) vs. sucrose 4.09(3.82), p = 0.24] between groups. The PIPP score attained baseline values at 5-min in both groups.

conclusionAlbeit sucrose indicated instantaneous action, SSC and sucrose have comparable clinical efficacy for preterm neonatal pain control. Multisensory stimulation with SSC may result in a higher behavioral state component of the PIPP score.

Indexed as

PainSucroseCross-Over StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureSkin CareSucrose

Identifiers

PMID32152488
OpenAlexW3010272710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.