Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152467›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2021

A modern review of penile traction monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of peyronie's disease.

Raevti Bole, Lindsay White, Niki Parikh, Sevann Helo, Tobias Kohler, Matthew Ziegelmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Current treatment concepts for Peyronie's disease].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raevti BoleMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-0185
Lindsay WhiteMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Niki ParikhMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sevann HeloMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Tobias KohlerMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matthew ZiegelmannMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ziegelmann.matthew@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD)-related penile deformity is managed with multiple treatment modalities including oral medications, intralesional injections, and surgery. Penile traction therapy (PTT) is one such modality with purported benefits, albeit with notable differences in the characteristics of available traction devices and published study protocols. We provide a comprehensive review of the available data supporting PTT for PD treatment. We performed a rigorous database search to identify all studies pertaining to PTT for the treatment of PD through November 2019. Seventeen trials explored use of PTT as monotherapy or in combination with surgical or nonsurgical treatment, using over five different commercially available devices. All devices were well tolerated, although compliance and daily duration of use were highly variable. PTT resulted in variable improvements in stretched penile length and penile curvature, depending on study protocol, patient population, and device. PTT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for PD as monotherapy or in combination with other nonsurgical and surgical treatments, and for men in both the acute and chronic phases. Further studies are needed to compare available devices, evaluate device characteristics associated with treatment success, differentiate outcomes in acute vs. chronic PD populations, and determine the optimal duration of use.

Indexed as

Penile IndurationHumansInjections, IntralesionalMalePenisTractionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32152467
OpenAlexW3010333279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.