Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152461›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2020

Do infections have a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease?

Ruth F Itzhaki, Todd E Golde, Michael T Heneka, Ben Readhead

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The association of common infectious exposures with cognitive performance in community-dwelling older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ruth F ItzhakiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. ruth.itzhaki@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-5276
Todd E GoldeCenter for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, Department of Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA. tgolde@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1867-7071
Michael T HenekaDepartment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. michael.heneka@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4996-1630
Ben ReadheadASU-Banner Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. ben.readhead@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4353-9965
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USArizona State University · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea that infectious agents in the brain have a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD) was proposed nearly 30 years ago. However, this theory failed to gain substantial traction and was largely disregarded by the AD research community for many years. Several recent discoveries have reignited interest in the infectious theory of AD, culminating in a debate on the topic at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) in July 2019. In this Viewpoint article, experts who participated in the AAIC debate weigh up the evidence for and against the infectious theory of AD and suggest avenues for future research and drug development.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseApolipoprotein E4Borrelia burgdorferiBrainChlamydophila pneumoniaeHerpesvirus 1, HumanHerpesvirus 6, HumanHerpesvirus 7, HumanHumansInfectionsPorphyromonas gingivalisApolipoprotein E4

Identifiers

PMID32152461
OpenAlexW3009248191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.