Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152453›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2020

Legacy effect of delayed blood pressure lowering drug treatment in middle-aged adults with mildly elevated blood pressure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chau L B Ho, Sharon Sanders, Monique Breslin, Jenny Doust, Christopher M Reid, Barry R Davis, Lara M Simpson, Frank P Brouwers, Mark R Nelson

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chau L B HoMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia. chau.ho@utas.edu.au.
Sharon SandersInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Monique BreslinMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Jenny DoustInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Christopher M ReidSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Barry R DavisUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Lara M SimpsonUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Frank P BrouwersDepartment of Cardiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Postbus 40551 LN, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Mark R NelsonMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Bond University · AUMonash University · AUThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Tasmania · AUHaga Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate if there is evidence for a 'legacy effect' for blood pressure (BP) lowering treatment, that is, worse health outcomes from not initiating drug treatment at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg in middle-age adults. We systematically reviewed studies comparing the effects of delayed BP treatment (placebo/untreated during the trial or no previous treatment at trial entry) vs. early treatment (actively treated during the trial or previous BP treatment at trial entry) on mortality in the short term (5-year in-trial period) and long term (≥10 years in total period). The data were pooled using Peto ORs. A subgroup analysis by 10-year Framingham risk score was performed. Three studies (ALLHAT, Oslo and PREVEND-IT) involving 4746 participants were included. The results were heavily influenced by the ALLHAT trial. We found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between 'delayed BP' and 'early treatment' in the short-term OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.68-1.32) or long-term OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.78-1.04), with similar results for mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). The effects of delayed BP lowering treatment on long-term all-cause and CVD mortality did not vary with baseline risk of CVD. The review showed no clinically adverse 'legacy effect' on mortality or major CVD event from not treating middle-aged adults at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg or over. The results were consistent for all CVD risk subgroups. Although these studies are non-randomised post-hoc analyses, they may allay concerns that early treatment of elevated systolic BP is necessary to prevent CVD events in primary prevention populations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionPharmaceutical PreparationsAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansMiddle AgedAntihypertensive AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID32152453
OpenAlexW3010145051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.