Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152166›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Length of stay in long-term care facilities: a comparison of residents in six European countries. Results of the PACE cross-sectional study.

Danni Collingridge Moore, Sheila Payne, Thomas Keegan, Lieve Van den Block, Luc Deliens, Giovanni Gambassi, Rauha Heikkila, Viola Kijowska, H Roeline Pasman, Lara Pivodic and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Declining demands or constraining supply? Explaining the trend of care home entry in England 2001-2021.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Danni Collingridge MooreInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK d.collingridgemoore@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5861-8706
Sheila PayneInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Thomas KeeganInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Lieve Van den BlockEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Giovanni GambassiUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuoro, Rome, Italy.
Rauha HeikkilaAgeing, Disability and Functioning Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Viola KijowskaUnit for Research on Aging Society, Department of Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
H Roeline PasmanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Expertise center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lara PivodicEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Katherine FroggattInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Lancaster University · GBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIJagiellonian University · PLUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper aims to investigate resident, facility and country characteristics associated with length of stay in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) across six European countries.

settingData from a cross-sectional study of deceased residents, conducted in LTCFs in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland.

participantsAll residents aged 65 years and older at admission who died in a 3-month period residing in a proportional random sample of LTCFs were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was length of stay in days, calculated from date of admission and date of death. Resident, facility and country characteristics were included in a proportional hazards model.

resultsThe proportion of deaths within 1 year of admission was 42% (range 32%-63%). Older age at admission (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), being married/in a civil partnership at time of death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89), having cancer at time of death (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.10) and admission from a hospital (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.37) or another LTCF (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.40) were associated with shorter lengths of stay across all countries. Being female (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90) was associated with longer lengths of stay.

conclusionsLength of stay varied significantly between countries. Factors prior to LTCF admission, in particular the availability of resources that allow an older adult to remain living in the community, appear to influence length of stay. Further research is needed to explore the availability of long-term care in the community prior to admission and its influence on the trajectories of LTCF residents in Europe.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHealth StatusHomes for the AgedHumansLength of StayMaleMental HealthNursing HomesPhysical Functional PerformanceRetrospective StudiesSex Factorsdementiaepidemiologygeriatric medicine

Identifiers

PMID32152166
PMCPMC7064078
OpenAlexW3009096924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.