Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152153›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

What types of dissemination of information occurred between researchers, providers and clinical staff while implementing an asthma shared decision-making intervention: a directed content analysis.

Thomas Ludden, Lindsay Shade, Madelyn Welch, Jacqueline Halladay, Katrina E Donahue, Tamera Coyne-Beasley, Paul Bray, Hazel Tapp

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02047929 (Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02047929 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Traditional and Participatory Dissemination of a Shared Decision Making Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2013 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsAsthmaArmsAsthma Shared Decision Making (SDM) Toolkit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas LuddenDepartment of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA tom.ludden@atriumhealth.org.ORCID 0000-0001-5217-0229
Lindsay ShadeDepartment of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Madelyn WelchSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Jacqueline HalladayDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Katrina E DonahueDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tamera Coyne-BeasleyDepartment of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Paul BrayCommunity Based Care, Vidant Medical Center, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Hazel TappDepartment of Family Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo qualitatively analyse different types of dissemination of information during monthly group calls between researchers, providers and clinical staff used to establish best practices for implementing an asthma shared decision-making (SDM) intervention. Evaluating dissemination of information can provide a better understanding of how best practices are shared, informing implementation approaches to improve the uptake of new evidence and overcome barriers.

setting10 primary care practices in North Carolina.

participantsProviders and clinical staff participated in monthly group phone calls with researchers to share best practices during implementation of a SDM intervention for asthma patients.

designThe research team transcribed and coded statements using content analysis into three different knowledge types: Knowledge Position, Knowledge Form and Knowledge Object. Knowledge Objects were further classified using directed content analysis where the research team interpreted the content objects through a classification process of identifying themes or patterns to describe three different types of dissemination of information: (A) Confirmation of Existing Knowledge, (B) Generation of New Knowledge and (C) Spreading of New Knowledge.

resultsAcross the 8 transcripts, 4 Knowledge Positions, 7 Knowledge Forms and 18 types of Knowledge Objects were identified. From the Knowledge Objects, Confirmation of Existing Knowledge occurred during the training of participating practices. The review also identified Generation of New Knowledge by providers and clinical staff raised in these calls. This Generation of New Knowledge was later documented being used by other practices with the identification of Spreading of New Knowledge.

conclusionThe research team described the types of dissemination of information that occurred between researchers, providers and clinical staff during implementation of an asthma SDM intervention. Both Confirmation of Existing Knowledge and Generation of New Knowledge in response to barriers occurred. These exploratory dissemination of information results provide additional mechanisms for evaluating implementation science. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02047929; Post-results.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedHealth PersonnelInformation DisseminationInterprofessional RelationsResearch PersonnelAsthmaHumansImplementation ScienceNorth CarolinaPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchasthmaimplementationshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32152153
PMCPMC7064133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.