ArticleBMJ open2020
Complex programme evaluation of a 'new care model' vanguard: a shared commitment to quality improvement in an integrated health and care context.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the use of actor-network theory in healthcare: a protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Trust-building in temporary public health partnerships: a qualitative study of the partnership formation process of a Covid-19 test, trace and protect service.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Evaluating primary care transformation: synthesis of findings from UK pilot project reviews.BJGP open · 2023Article
- A typology of integrated care policies in the care home sector: A policy document analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Towards an Understanding of Population Health Data in a Single NHS Trust during COVID-19.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- When trust, confidence, and faith collide: refining a realist theory of how and why inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work.BMC health services research · 2021Review
- Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis.Health research policy and systems · 2021Review
- Exploring the consequences of patient commitment to cardiac rehabilitation program: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Article
- Realist evaluation for programs and services in the health area: an integrative review of the theoretical and methodological literature.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NHS vanguards, under-pressure to perform, required better contracting and data management arrangements with evaluation teams, to ensure that integrated service outcomes could be reported effectively. This communication reflects the experience of evaluating an NHS vanguard and suggests how academic teams can improve capacity for complex programme evaluation of rapid improvements in integrated services. This should be based on a shared commitment to data collection and management. Also, robust knowledge exchange processes can enable systems change and sustainability. The identifying features of the particular site have been withheld.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.