Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32152111›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Two systems for thinking about others' thoughts in the developing brain.

Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann, Angela D Friederici, Tania Singer, Nikolaus Steinbeis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intentional sadness contagion: Social bonding with neural decoupling.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dissonant music engages early visual processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A fronto-insular-parietal network for the sense of body ownership.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Maturational Indices of the Cognitive Control Network Are Associated with Inhibitory Control in Early Childhood.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlotte Grosse WiesmannResearch Group Milestones of Early Cognitive Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; wiesmann@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-6174
Angela D FriedericiDepartment of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Tania SingerSocial Neuroscience Lab, Max Planck Society, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Nikolaus SteinbeisDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DEMax Planck Society · DEUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human social interaction crucially relies on the ability to infer what other people think. Referred to as Theory of Mind (ToM), this ability has long been argued to emerge around 4 y of age when children start passing traditional verbal ToM tasks. This developmental dogma has recently been questioned by nonverbal ToM tasks passed by infants younger than 2 y of age. How do young children solve these tests, and what is their relation to the later-developing verbal ToM reasoning? Are there two different systems for nonverbal and verbal ToM, and when is the developmental onset of mature adult ToM? To address these questions, we related markers of cortical brain structure (i.e., cortical thickness and surface area) of 3- and 4-y-old children to their performance in novel nonverbal and traditional verbal TM tasks. We showed that verbal ToM reasoning was supported by cortical surface area and thickness of the precuneus and temporoparietal junction, classically involved in ToM in adults. Nonverbal ToM reasoning, in contrast, was supported by the cortical structure of a distinct and independent neural network including the supramarginal gyrus also involved in emotional and visual perspective taking, action observation, and social attention or encoding biases. This neural dissociation suggests two systems for reasoning about others' minds-mature verbal ToM that emerges around 4 y of age, whereas nonverbal ToM tasks rely on different earlier-developing possibly social-cognitive processes.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsProblem SolvingBrainBrain MappingChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetTheory of MindThinkingbrain developmentcortical thicknessfalse beliefgray matterTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID32152111
PMCPMC7104351
OpenAlexW2982630278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.