ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2020
Redundant visual signals reduce the intensity of alcohol impairment.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHumans interact with multiple stimuli across several modalities each day. The "redundant signal effect" refers to the observation that individuals respond more quickly to stimuli when information is presented as multisensory, redundant stimuli (e.g., aurally and visually), rather than as a single stimulus presented to either modality alone. Studies of alcohol effects on human performance show that alcohol induced impairment is reduced when subjects respond to redundant multisensory stimuli. However, redundant signals do not need to involve multisensory stimuli to facilitate behavior as studies have shown facilitating effects by redundant unisensory signals that are delivered to the "same sensory" (e.g., two visual or two auditory signals).
methodsThe current study examined the degree to which redundant visual signals would reduce alcohol impairment and compared the magnitude of this effect with that produced by redundant multisensory signals. On repeated test sessions, participants (n = 20) received placebo or 0.65 g/kg alcohol and performed a two-choice reaction time task that measured how quickly participants responded to four different signal conditions. The four conditions differed by the modality of the target presentation: visual, auditory, multisensory, and unisensory.
resultsAlcohol slowed performance in all conditions and reaction times were generally faster in the redundant signal conditions. Both multisensory and unisensory redundant signals reduced the impairing effects of alcohol compared with single signals.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that the ability of redundant signals to counteract alcohol impairment does not require multisensory input. Duplicate signals to the same modality can also reduce alcohol impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.