Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151605›Full record

ArticleJornal de pediatria

Profile of non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: interface with impulsiveness and loneliness.

Renata Pires de Oliveira Costa, Anna Lara Rocha Pinheiro Peixoto, Cirllainy Clécia Alves Lucas, Débora Nicácio Falcão, Jennifer Thayse da Silva Farias, Luiz Felipe Pereira Viana, Manuela Andrade de Alencar Pereira, Maria Letícia Barboza Sandes, Thomas Bernardes Lopes, Kristiana Cerqueira Mousinho and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Association between Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Perfectionism in Adolescence: The Role of Mental Disorders.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata Pires de Oliveira CostaCentro Universitário CESMAC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pesquisa em Saúde, Maceió, AL, Brazil. Electronic address: psicologia_renatapires@hotmail.com.
Anna Lara Rocha Pinheiro PeixotoCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Psicologia, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Cirllainy Clécia Alves LucasCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Psicologia, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Débora Nicácio FalcãoCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Medicina, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Jennifer Thayse da Silva FariasCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Psicologia, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Luiz Felipe Pereira VianaCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Medicina, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Manuela Andrade de Alencar PereiraCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Medicina, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Maria Letícia Barboza SandesCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Psicologia, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Thomas Bernardes LopesCentro Universitário CESMAC, Departamento de Medicina, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Kristiana Cerqueira MousinhoCentro Universitário CESMAC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pesquisa em Saúde, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Euclides Maurício Trindade-FilhoCentro Universitário CESMAC, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Pesquisa em Saúde, Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Centro Universitário Cesmac · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveComprehend the profile and prevalence of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) in adolescents and its association with impulsiveness and loneliness.

methodsCross-sectional study carried out in 2017 in Maceió-Alagoas, Northeast Brazil, in the households of 505 adolescents aged 12-17 years, using a sample stratified and randomized by gender and neighborhood. The following instruments were used: a sociodemographic questionnaire, Brazilian version of Functional Assessment of Self-Mutilation (FASM), the Brazilian Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), and the Brazilian Loneliness Scale (UCLA-BR).

resultsA prevalence of 6.53% was found for non-suicidal self-injury disorder (DSM-5). Significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) were observed regarding: the most frequently used forms of NSSI were the items "cut oneself" and "scratch oneself"; engaging in three or more different forms of self-injurious behavior (66.67%) and, reporting as reasons, "to relieve feelings of emptiness or indifference" and "to stop bad feelings/sensations." Significance was also related to the sociodemographic profile: 72.73% were females and 63.54% had family income below one minimum wage. Individuals with self-injurious behavior also had higher impulsiveness and loneliness scores (p ≤ 0.05).

conclusionsThe study identified a direct association between NSSI and impulsiveness and loneliness among adolescents, being more prevalent in females and in young individuals with socioeconomic vulnerability. The data provide support for improving public health policies, aimed at education, prevention, and treatment of adolescents with NSSI.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLonelinessMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentImpulsive behaviorLonelinessNon-suicidal self-injuryPrevalenceSelf-injurious behavior

Identifiers

PMID32151605
PMCPMC9432040
OpenAlexW3009267845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.