Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151295›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Nut consumption in a representative survey of Australians: a secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey.

Cassandra J Nikodijevic, Yasmine C Probst, Marijka J Batterham, Linda C Tapsell, Elizabeth P Neale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knowledge, practices and perceptions of energy labelling of nut products among Australian consumers and stakeholders: an online survey.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Barriers and Facilitators to Nut Consumption: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cassandra J NikodijevicFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
Yasmine C ProbstFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
Marijka J BatterhamFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
Linda C TapsellFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
Elizabeth P NealeFaculty of Science, Medicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNut consumption is associated with a range of health benefits. The current study aimed to examine nut consumption in the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS) and to investigate associations between nut intake, nutrient intake and anthropometric and blood pressure measurements.

designSecondary analysis of the 2011-2012 NNPAS. Usual consumption of nuts in the 2011-2012 NNPAS was determined, and nut consumption was compared with population recommendations of 30 g nuts per day. The relationship between nut consumption and intakes of key nutrients, anthropometric outcomes (weight, BMI and waist circumference) and blood pressure was examined using linear regression for participants aged over 18 years.

settingAustralia.

participantsAustralians (2 years and older, n 12 153) participating in the representative 2011-2012 NNPAS.

resultsMean nut intake was 4·61 (95 % CI: 4·36, 4·86) g/d, with only 5·6 % of nut consumers consuming 30 g of nuts per day. Nut consumption was associated with significantly greater intakes of fibre, vitamin E, Fe, Mg and P. There was no association between nut consumption and body weight, BMI, waist circumference, or blood pressure.

conclusionsExploration of nut consumption in a representative sample of Australians identified that nut intake does not meet recommendations. Higher nut consumption was not adversely associated with higher body weight, aligning with the current evidence base. Given the current levels of nut consumption in Australia, strategies to increase nut intake to recommended levels are required.

Indexed as

NutsAdultAnthropometryAustraliaBlood PressureDietExerciseHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysAustraliaNational Nutrition and Physical Activity SurveyNut consumptionObesity

Identifiers

PMID32151295
PMCPMC7737041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.