Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32151286›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2020

Molecular profiling of an osseous metastasis in glioblastoma during checkpoint inhibition: potential mechanisms of immune escape.

Malte Mohme, Cecile L Maire, Simon Schliffke, Simon A Joosse, Malik Alawi, Jakob Matschke, Ulrich Schüller, Judith Dierlamm, Tobias Martens, Klaus Pantel and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spinal and cervical nodal metastases in a patient with glioblastoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Glioblastoma: an organ-confined disease?Translational cancer research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malte MohmeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. m.mohme@uke.de.
Cecile L MaireDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Simon SchliffkeDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Simon A JoosseInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Malik AlawiBioinformatics Core, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jakob MatschkeInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich SchüllerInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Judith DierlammDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, Hubertus Wald University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias MartensDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus PantelInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sabine RiethdorfInstitute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katrin LamszusDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Manfred WestphalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. westphal@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral metastases of glioblastoma (GBM) are very rare despite the ability of GBM cells to pass through the blood-brain barrier and be disseminated through the peripheral blood. Here, we describe a detailed genetic and immunological characterization of a GBM metastasis in the skeleton, which occurred during anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint therapy. We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) and 850 K methylation profiling of the primary and recurrent intracranial GBM as well as one of the bone metastases. Copy number alterations (CNA) and mutational profiles were compared to known genomic alterations in the TCGA data base. In addition, immunophenotyping of the peripheral blood was performed. The patient who was primarily diagnosed with IDH-wildtype GBM. After the resection of the first recurrence, progressive intracranial re-growth was again detected, and chemotherapy was replaced by PD-1 checkpoint inhibition, which led to a complete intracranial remission. Two months later MR-imaging revealed multiple osseous lesions. Biopsy confirmed the GBM origin of the skeleton metastases. Immunophenotyping reflected the effective activation of a peripheral T-cell response, with, however, increase of regulatory T cells during disease progression. WGS sequencing demonstrated distinct genomic alterations of the GBM metastasis, with gains along chromosomes 3 and 9 and losses along chromosome 4, 10, and 11. Mutational analysis showed mutations in potentially immunologically relevant regions. Additionally, we correlated tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte and microglia presence to the occurrence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in a larger cohort and found a decreased infiltration of cytotoxic T cells in patients positive for CTCs. This study exemplifies that the tumour microenvironment may dictate the response to immune checkpoint therapy. In addition, our study highlights the fact that despite an effective control of intracranial GBM, certain tumour clones have the ability to evade the tumour-specific T-cell response and cause progression even outside of the CNS.

Indexed as

AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-H1 AntigenBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCD3 ComplexCD68 MoleculeChemoradiotherapyGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGlioblastomaHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticB7-H1 AntigenBevacizumabCD274 protein, humanCD3 ComplexCD68 antigen, humanCD68 MoleculeGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Circulating tumour cellsGlioblastomaImmune escapeMetastasisT-cellsTumour-infiltrating lymphocytesWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32151286
PMCPMC7063778
OpenAlexW3011471615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.